Michael V. Fox, «Behemoth and Leviathan», Vol. 93 (2012) 261-267
Scholarly consensus with regard to Behemoth and Leviathan in Job 40,15-24 and 40,25-41,26 emphasizes the evil and danger inherent in both. Behemoth is usually identified as the hippopotamus and Leviathan as the crocodile or a mythological dragon. The present article accepts the former identification but argues that Leviathan in the Theophany (as in Psalm 104,26) is based on the whale. The Theophany marginalizes the evil and dangers of the beasts. The author has left their hostility and violence in the background and has made them less aggressive and menacing, though still powerful, indomitable, and awesome.
265
BEHEMOTH AND LEVIATHAN
there was little cosmological distinction between a sea monster, a cetacean
or a great fish†19. In any case, the distinction between mythological and nat-
ural beings is a modern one. The creatures mentioned in Isa 13,21 and 34,14,
for example, include real animals and demons, all of them assumed to actu-
ally reside in the desert. For that matter, medieval and early modern mariners
who described sea serpents considered them natural creatures. (Most likely
they were seeing giant squids or other sea creatures.) The inaccuracies in
descriptions of monstrous but actual beasts do not prove that they are mytho-
logical, only that they were not well known. Artists based their depictions
based on stock legends and components of more familiar animals. Leviathan
in the Theophany is not identical either to the crocodile or to the whale, but
taken as a whole the picture is far closer to the latter.
Leviathan, like the whale but not the crocodile, is a denizen of the sea
and its depths (Job 41,23). The whale, not the crocodile, memorably
“sneezes,†shooting a spout that can be said to glow when the sun shines
through it (41,10a). The spout can be imagined as smoke or steam coming
from his nostrils (41,12). Nothing of the crocodile even vaguely resembles
a spout of smoke. Of course the picture of Leviathan is enhanced beyond
the natural when the poet tells of flames shooting from his nose and mouth
(41,11.13). But the whale alone can stir up the depths or whip up the abyss
into a boiling froth (41,23) ― as cetaceans memorably do by leaping and
crashing back into the water ― or leave a white wake (bytn) behind it
(41,24). Crocodiles, in sharp contrast, glide smoothly and almost unde-
tectably though the water and emerge in an instant.
Nor is Leviathan in the Theophany the chaos monster known from
Northwest Semitic mythology, though that is the idea of Leviathan that
Job himself holds (3,9). Leviathan in the Theophany is incompatible with
what we know of the mythical monster, which had multiple heads (Ps
74,14; KTU 1.5 I 3) and was serpentine (Isa 27,1).
The Leviathan of Psalm 104,26 is clearly a cetacean: !wklhy twyna ~X
wb-qxXl trcy-hz !tywl. By a complex pun on !tywl ― which can mean
“Leviathan†or “their escort†20 ― this sentence has a double meaning:
“There [in the great sea] ships travel, (and) Leviathan, whom you created
to play withâ€; and “There ships travel, (and) their escort, which you cre-
ated to play thereinâ€. Leviathan is shown both as a sea creature with which
God “plays†― perhaps in an aggressive fashion (see Job 40,29) ― and
as one of the animals that accompany ships in apparent playfulness, as
Ibid., 9.
19
hYwIl. means “escort†in Rabbinic Hebrew. Though the noun is not found
"
20
in Biblical Hebrew, it is a standard nominal formation from hwl and would
have been easily understandable in earlier times. The pun is consonantal and
visual, not primarily aural, because “their escort†would be vocalized !t'Y"wIl..
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2012 - Tutti i diritti riservati