Aron Pinker, «On the Meaning of Job 4,18», Vol. 93 (2012) 500-519
This paper argues that the terms wydb( and wyk)lm in Job 4,18 should be understood as referring to the set motions of the sun, moon, and stars as well as to sporadic meteorological events, respectively. Such understanding does not dilute the validity and force of the qal wahomer in 4,18-19. The comparison is between the inanimate but permanent (sun, moon, stars, meteorological phenomena) and the animate but impermanent (humans). The difficult hlht is assumed to have been originally hhflft;@ from hhl, «languish, faint». Taking hlht as having the meaning «weakness» provides a sense that eminently fits a natural event.
02_Biblica_1_B_Pinker_Layout 1 30/01/13 13:15 Pagina 518 02_B
518 ARON PINKER
Eliphaz alludes in 4,17 to the more fundamental thesis, which
can be formulated thus: If there are imperfections in God’s creation,
then there must be imperfections in a mortal’s deeds. This appears
to be Eliphaz’s main thesis and failing. The qal wahomer in 4,18-
19 is an illustration of Eliphaz’s thesis and 4,20-21 of his doctrinal
failing. If God finds faults with inanimate natural phenomena, then
there must be faults also with human beings. Eliphaz goes, how-
ever, a step further. He reasons: If there are faults with human be-
ings, then it makes sense that their lot is misery (4,20-21) 73. In his
view, Job “was a sinner as all men are sinners. Sin is inherent in
mankind. Sin and therefore suffering are racial concomitants†74.
Thus, what Job considers an imperfection Eliphaz views as a proper
state of being. Eliphaz failed because of a loss of sense of propor-
tion. Andersen aptly notes “Eliphaz is following a path of truth that
will lead him into a great error†75.
Nowhere in the Tanach is distrust and misbehavior associated
with heavenly beings or angels 76. There is no reason for the author
of the Book of Job to break with this tradition and introduce a no-
tion undermining the theological foundation of the Tanach. The va-
lidity of the qal wahomer in 4,18-19 is maintained when the terms
wydb( and wyk)lm are understood as referring to the set motions
of the sun, moon, and stars as well as to the sporadic meteorological
events, respectively.
This understanding of the terms wydb( and wyk)lm allows also
for a reasonable resolution of the seeming contradiction between the
doctrine of retribution and the doctrine of universal sinfulness. In
4,18 God’s displeasure can only relate to the “manner†in which these
inanimate bodies and phenomena execute their prescribed task. The
qal wahomer in 4,18-19 implies that Eliphaz refers in 4,19 to God’s
possible displeasure with the “manner†in which righteous “acts†are
executed by humans. It is possible to be a righteous person by per-
forming only righteous acts. However, it is also possible simultane-
ously to be deficient in the “manner†of performing the righteous
R. GORDIS, The Book of Job (New York 1978) 518-519, n. 6. Eliphaz
73
suggests that all people are imperfect sinful creatures, and no one can be just
before God; therefore everyone can expect to suffer.
FULLERTON, “Entendreâ€, 330.
74
ANDERSEN, Job, 114.
75
The obscure Gen 6,4 does not necessarily refer to heavenly beings.
76
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2012 - Tutti i diritti riservati