Terrance Callan, «Reading the Earliest Copies of 2 Peter», Vol. 93 (2012) 427-450
An examination of the three earliest extant copies of 2 Peter (namely those found in Papyrus 72, Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus) is made in order to determine how the meaning of 2 Peter is affected by differences among the three copies, especially the textual variations among them. These textual variations produce significantly different understandings of Jesus in the three copies of 2 Peter, as well as other less prominent differences in meaning.
06_Biblica_1_D_Callan_Layout 1 05/11/12 12:20 Pagina 440
440 TERRANCE CALLAN
6. In 2,10 epiqumiaj has been corrected to epiqumia by putting a line
through the j; in 2,21 the letters si and a line indicating a final n
have been added at the end of a line after epignou to complete the
word. Likewise in 2,22 de has been added at the end of a line after
sumbebhken.
The scribe of 2 Peter in Sinaiticus is the one identified by Con-
stantin Tischendorf as scribe A, an identification confirmed by sub-
sequent investigations 20. Two other scribes also contributed to
Sinaiticus (though not 2 Peter), namely Tischendorf’s scribes B and
D. A is less adept than D, but more adept than B. Milne and Skeat say
that scribe D is “the most correct, who alone reaches the standard of
good literary papyriâ€, and that “Scribe A is markedly inferior to D†21.
Dirk Jongkind says, “The work of scribe A and scribe B is not of a
very high qualityâ€. And he affirms the words of Westcott and Hort
about the Sinaiticus New Testament as accurately describing the work
of scribe A, namely that it shows “all the ordinary lapses due to rapid
and careless transcription†and a “bold and rough manner of transcrip-
tion†22. In some contrast to the scribal abilities of A and B, according
to Jongkind, “the bookhand of all three scribes is well formed, regular,
and fairly standardized among the three†23.
The corrections described in 1 and 2 above derive from the cor-
rector called C by Tischendorf and subsequent investigators. This
derivation is shown in both cases by the way the place of the cor-
rection in the text is indicated. The use of two arrows pointing in
the same direction, one at the point of insertion, the other next to
the text to be inserted, is characteristic of C corrections written in
upper or lower margins. Likewise the use of two wavy lines, one
at the point of insertion, the other next to the text to be inserted, is
characteristic of C corrections written in the side margins 24. The C
20
See H.J.M. MILNE ‒ T.C. SKEAT (with contributions by D. COCKERELL),
Scribes and Correctors of the Codex Sinaiticus (London 1938) 18-29; D.
JONGKIND, Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus (Piscataway, NJ 2007) 9-18, 26-27.
21
The first quotation is from Scribes and Correctors, 53; the second from
page 54.
22
The first quotation is from Scribal Habits, 253; Jongkind quotes WESTCOTT
‒ HORT on page 255. He quotes from B.F. WESTCOTT ‒ F.J. A. HORT, The New
Testament in the Original Greek. Introduction, Appendix (London 21896) 246-247.
23
JONGKIND, Scribal Habits, 59.
24
MILNE ‒ SKEAT, Scribes and Correctors, 46.