Bradley C. Gregory, «Slips of the Tongue in the Speech Ethics of Ben Sira», Vol. 93 (2012) 321-339
This article examines the references to slips of the tongue in the speech ethics of Ben Sira. Against the background of Proverbs, this characterization of accidental speech errors represents a new development. Its origin can be traced to the confluence between sapiential metaphors for mistakes in life and the idea of a slip of the tongue in the Hellenistic world. Ben Sira’s references to slips of the tongue are generally coordinated with a lack of discipline, though at least two verses seem to suggest that slips are not always sinful and that they represent a universal phenomenon, found even among the wisest sages.
01_Biblica_1_F_Gregory_Layout 1 05/11/12 12:13 Pagina 334
334 BRADLEY C. GREGORY
Remember your father and mother
when you sit among the great ones
Lest you forget yourself in their presence
and through your habit you make a fool of yourself.
Then you will wish you had not been born
and the day of your birth you will curse.
A person who is accustomed to words of reproach
will not become disciplined as long as he lives. (23,13-15)
The speech in this passage is characterized as lacking discipline
and being harsh. If in v. 13a “avsurh,j†(“lewdâ€) is doubtful on text-
critical grounds, then any kind of impious speech is included in the
warning. The consequences of social shame cited by Ben Sira must
be understood in light of Ben Sira’s social location among the re-
tainer class that served the Jerusalem aristocracy 29. While “sitting
among the great†can refer to a banquet situation (cf. 32,9) 30, it can
also refer to other social or political contexts (cf. 11,1; 38,3; 39,4).
Even if sinful speech has minimal negative consequences in private
contexts, the habituation of speaking sinfully or harshly increases
the likelihood of a slip of the tongue when the social stakes are high.
Such an accidental slip seems to be what Ben Sira has in mind in v.
14c-d when he speaks of forgetting oneself and looking like a fool
because of bad speech habits. As a deterrent to allowing dangerous
speech habits to develop, Ben Sira reminds his students of the re-
sulting anguish and the shame that would be brought upon their par-
ents. For the present purposes, what is particularly important is that
this kind of a slip of the tongue, which has objectionable content,
results through habit 31. This comports with Ben Sira’s other state-
omitted (against many commentators). The condemnation of lewd speech has
no precedent in Israelite wisdom literature, but it is a significant concern
among Greek writers; see J.F. HULTIN, The Ethics of Obscene Speech in Early
Christianity and Its Environment (NTSup 128; Leiden 2008) 120-128. The
significant currency of “avsurh,j†in Greek literature combined with its absence
from both the Vetus Latina and the Syriac of 23,13 suggests that it is a sec-
ondary, exegetical addition or gloss in the Greek (cf. SMEND, Die Weisheit
des Jesus Sirach, 209).
29
Regarding Ben Sira’s social location see R. HORSLEY, Scribes, Visionar-
ies, and the Politics of Second Temple Judea (Louisville, KY 2007) 53-70.
30
So HULTIN, Ethics of Obscene Speech, 125.
31
Elsewhere Ben Sira especially associates lying with the danger of form-
ing a bad habit (7,13; 20,25), though he does not mention accidents that result
from the habit.