John Kilgallen, «Was Jesus Right to Eat with Sinners and Tax Collectors?», Vol. 93 (2012) 590-600
All Jewish religious teachers wanted sinners to repent; how one achieves this was disputed, as was Jesus’ choosing to associate with sinners in their houses and at their meals. Four times Luke describes Jesus as fraternizing with sinners, which violated Jewish pious practice. The first three times (chaps. 5, 7 and 15) Jesus underlines his motive for this conduct and its value; the fourth time (chap. 19), and rather late in the Gospel, Luke shows that indeed Jesus’ method proved true, i.e. the wisdom of his conduct was shown justified by repentant children of God.
- «Acts 28,28 — Why?» 2009 176-187
- «Luke 20,13 and i1swj» 2008 263-264
- «Luke wrote to Rome – a Suggestion» 2007 251-255
- «What Does It Mean to Say That There Are Additions in Luke 7,36-50?» 2005 529-535
- «Hostility to Paul in Pisidian Antioch (Acts 13,45) — Why?» 2003 1-15
- «Martha and Mary: Why at Luke 10,38-42?» 2003 554-561
- «‘With many other words’ (Acts 2,40): Theological Assumptions in Peter’s Pentecost Speech» 2002 71-87
- «The Obligation to Heal (Luke 13,10-17)» 2001 402-409
- «`The Apostles Whom He Chose because of the Holy Spirit'
A Suggestion Regarding Acts 1,2» 2000 414-417
- «The Strivings of the Flesh
(Galatians 5,17)» 1999 113-114
- «Jesus First Trial: Messiah and Son of God (Luke 22,66-71)» 1999 401-414
- «The Importance of the Redactor in Luke 18,9-14» 1998 69-75
07_Biblica_2_AM_B_Kilgallen_Layout 1 30/01/13 13:17 Pagina 594 07_B
594 JOHN KILGALLEN
obliged to demur: great as John is, anyone who believes in Jesus (= “the
least in the kingdom of heavenâ€) will have the greater reward.
This attention to “faith in Jesus†moves the discourse to include the
moral plane. Luke himself interrupts Jesus’ speech to offer a summary of
responses to the famed call of John to repentance; some indeed accepted
his baptism, but certain religious leaders frustrated God’s plan for saving
them 10. It is in the light of this Lucan parenthesis that Jesus speaks again,
to complain against the “people of this generationâ€. These people accept
neither John nor Jesus, and reject them based on the conduct of each.
Presumably John’s call to repentance will not be accepted because he
is possessed by Satan and so not from God; his way of life, the people of
this generation say, proves this possession.
Jesus faces opposition and refusal for a different reason. He is not accused
of being possessed by Satan (though on another occasion certain people said,
“By the power of Beelzebul, the prince of demons, he drives out demonsâ€,
11,15). His rejection is based on something else, namely the charge, “Look,
a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners†(7,34). One
can say that such a charge comes purely from a refusal to repent, no matter
the conduct of him who calls to repentance. We can add, however, that Jesus’
conduct was in such conflict with prevalent religious opinion and practice
that faith in him was most unlikely 11. In the face of this criticism Jesus offers
a wisdom saying that applies to his situation: “But wisdom is vindicated (de-
clared just) by all her children†(7,35). This proverb, applicable to more than
this one situation, suggests here that repentance proves that wisdom is truly
wise. Religious leaders, as we have explained them, know that the repentant
person is indeed a wise person, and fulfills God’s plan for salvation in Israel.
Thus, it is to the result of Jesus’ methods for repentance that Jesus appeals;
that is, look to the result of my association with sinners and learn from this
result the positive value of the means which achieves this result, my be-
friending sinners and tax collectors. The argumentation is succinct, leaving
the listener to work out its logic.
In brief, Jesus once again looks to his goal in conducting himself as he
does, the goal of his mission as he speaks of it at the dinner with tax col-
lectors and sinners (5,32). What Jesus offers now in chap. 7 is a proof that
his method is justified, for, in a generalized statement in proverbial form,
he points to a number of people who have done what God and Wisdom
The point had been made about sinners before the Gospel was written:
10
“avgnoou/ntej ga.r th.n tou/ qeou/ dikaiosu,nhn kai. th.n ivdi,an ÃŽdikaiosu,nhnÃ
zhtou/ntej sth/sai( th/| dikaiosu,nh| tou/ qeou/ ouvc u`peta,ghsan†(Rom 10,3).
“It is altogether clear that Jesus does not ‘stand off’ as he should (and
11
as they do) by these standards [of the Pharisees based on texts of their Scrip-
tures] and that, to this degree, in their eyes he lacks the comportment of one
who is ‘righteous’â€, D. JEFFREY, Luke (Brazos Theological Commentary on
the Bible; Grand Rapids, MI 2012) 191.
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2012 - Tutti i diritti riservati