Michael V. Fox, «God's Answer and Job's Response», Vol. 94 (2013) 1-23
The current understanding of the Book of Job, put forth by M. Tsevat in 1966 and widely accepted, is that YHWH implicitly denies the existence of divine justice. Retribution is not part of reality, but only a delusion. The present article argues that the book teaches the need for fidelity in the face of divine injustice. The Theophany shows a God whose care for the world of nature hints at his care for humans. The reader, unlike Job, knows that Job's suffering is important to God, as establishing the possibility of true human loyalty.
22 MICHAEL V. FOX
be the way things are, by the book’s presuppositions. For only in
the absence of full knowledge of God’s intentions, and only in the
awareness that some of his ways are unjust, is it possible to fear
God gratuitously and to disprove the Adversary’s insinuation that
this is humanly impossible (1,9).
XI. The Reader
The book of Job is not for Job; it is for its readers. Readers, who
observe Job’s world from above, and who, unlike Job, have read the
Prologue, are allowed a privileged, superior perspective and are even
given insight into the mind of God.
The Prologue lays down the book’s presuppositions. One of them
is that God wants human fidelity, not only their obedience but also their
unconditional faith in his goodness. God’s desire for human fidelity
suggests a deep need, for he is willing to abandon justice in some cases
to make this possible. It is not necessary that justice be absent from the
world in order for faith to be unconditional; it is enough that execution
of justice not be certain. The possibility of injustice can also be a com-
fort to sufferers, for they can know that their pain is not proof of guilt.
The lament psalmists do this 73, Jeremiah does this (15,15-18; 20,14-
18), the author of Ludlul does this, and Job does as well (13,6.16;
19,26; and above all, 31,6, in which he is convinced that God judges
justly when he judges) 74. To be sure, Job’s professions of faith stand
uneasily alongside his accusations of God and his expressions of de-
spair. Job is inconsistent, but so is God 75.
This is the meaning of human silence in the psalms, including complaint
73
psalms: not a confession of guilt, but a complaint about suffering together with
confidence that God will save them. Examples are Pss 38,14; 39,3; 50,21;
62,6; 131,2. There are sharp differences between Job and the psalmists, of
course, notably in the psalmists’ expression of hope and trust in God’s eventual
goodness. Still, Job’s silence in 40,4-5 may connote, or at least allow for, a
measure of hope, since he has been reminded of God’s care for his creatures.
See also NEWSOM’s Book of Job, 183-199, fine description of the “work-
74
ing rhetorical world†into which Job invites the reader in chapters 29-31. She
observes that “[a]gain and again, Job warrants his own behavior in relation
to the expectations and judgments of God, who is the source and sustainer of
this moral world†(196).
Job’s inconsistency is matched by Jeremiah’s. Jeremiah has accurately
75
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2012 - Tutti i diritti riservati