Michael V. Fox, «God's Answer and Job's Response», Vol. 94 (2013) 1-23
The current understanding of the Book of Job, put forth by M. Tsevat in 1966 and widely accepted, is that YHWH implicitly denies the existence of divine justice. Retribution is not part of reality, but only a delusion. The present article argues that the book teaches the need for fidelity in the face of divine injustice. The Theophany shows a God whose care for the world of nature hints at his care for humans. The reader, unlike Job, knows that Job's suffering is important to God, as establishing the possibility of true human loyalty.
12 MICHAEL V. FOX
whether humans can capture him with hooks, for though 40,24 is for-
mulated as an indicative it may be an unmarked rhetorical question
meaning that Behemoth cannot be captured even by hooks in his nose
and eyes. (Hippopotami were in fact hunted in Egypt, but the author
may not have known this.) In any case, the hippopotamus is most def-
initely a formidable beast.
Though Leviathan is usually thought to be a crocodile 42, the
picture of Leviathan is, I have argued 43, based on whales, or per-
haps whales conflated with schools of dolphins. Whales could be
known from reports of seafarers, — “those who go down to the
sea†as they are called in Ps 107,23, and who are said to tell God’s
wonders (v. 24). Ben Sira (43,24-25) likewise speaks of “those who
go down to the sea†and tell of its wonders, namely God’s amazing
creatures and “the power of Rahabâ€.
I do not say that Leviathan in Job is a whale, but that this depiction
is based on one. Leviathan was a sea monster who could be imagined
variously from features of actual animals, such as a serpent’s coiling 44.
And contrary to a common notion, whales are to be found in the
Mediterranean 45. The whale, not the crocodile, “sneezesâ€, ejecting a
spout that can be said to glow when the sun shines through it (41,10a)
and be pictured as smoke or steam (41,12). And the whale, not the croc-
odile, stirs up the depths and makes the abyss seem to boil (41,23) by
leaping and crashing back into the water, and thereby leaving behind a
white wake (bytn) (41,24).
See CLINES, Job 38-42, 155-156. The biblical authors pictured Leviathan
42
in various ways. In Isa 27,1, Leviathan is called a “swift serpentâ€; thus too in
Job 26,13. But this epithet cannot possibly fit the Leviathan in Job 41. Nor is
Leviathan in Job 41 compatible with the monster of multiple heads (Ps 74,14;
KTU 1.5.I.3). Though a crocodile might be called a serpent, it could not have
been more than vaguely the model for the mythical Leviathan, who was a
deep-sea creature.
FOX, “Behemoth and Leviathanâ€, 264-266.
43
Until modern times, whales were often depicted in fantastic and mon-
44
strous guises; see the references in my “Behemoth and Leviathanâ€, 265. In
any case, the distinction between real and mythological animals is a modern
one. The creatures mentioned in Isa 13,21 and 34,14 include both real animals
and demons, all of them assumed to actually reside in the desert.
These include the fin whale and the sperm whale. See P.G.H. EVANS,
45
The Natural History of Whales & Dolphins (London 1987) 60-69; 93-94, and
further references in FOX, “Behemoth and Leviathanâ€.
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2012 - Tutti i diritti riservati