Michael V. Fox, «God's Answer and Job's Response», Vol. 94 (2013) 1-23
The current understanding of the Book of Job, put forth by M. Tsevat in 1966 and widely accepted, is that YHWH implicitly denies the existence of divine justice. Retribution is not part of reality, but only a delusion. The present article argues that the book teaches the need for fidelity in the face of divine injustice. The Theophany shows a God whose care for the world of nature hints at his care for humans. The reader, unlike Job, knows that Job's suffering is important to God, as establishing the possibility of true human loyalty.
13
GOD’S ANSWER AND JOB’S RESPONSE
Leviathan is a whale (possibly conflated with dolphins) in Ps
104,26, wb-qxfl trcy-hz !tywl !wklhy twyna ~v. By word-play, this
means both “There [in the great sea] ships travel, (and) Leviathan
(!tywl), which you created to play withâ€, and “There ships travel, (and)
'" > i
their escort (!t'Y"wIl.), which you created to play thereinâ€. Pods of whales
and dolphins do indeed “escort†ships. In Psalm 104, Leviathan is one
of God’s playful creatures, neither particularly monstrous nor a threat
to civilization. In Job’s Theophany, humans cannot defeat him (40,25-
32; perhaps 41,1-6), but who would try? Of course a whale seen up-
close can be frightening, by virtue of its size if nothing else, but it
rarely imperils humans, except when they stick harpoons in it.
Leviathan in Ugaritic and Hebrew mythology was a primordial
monster who was among Baal’s, then YHWH’s, enemies. Perhaps
Behemoth was originally of the same sort. Nevertheless, the Theo-
phany lacks any hint of a creation battle or even of any particular
hostility between YHWH and these creatures. They have been con-
trolled and naturalized. To the author, they are majestic, powerful
creatures, like the warhorse (Job 39,19-25) 46.
VII. Questions 47
Rhetorical questions set the tone of the Theophany. If God praised
himself in the indicative, he would be merely boasting of powers that
Job never denied. If he had said, “I created the earth. I set its mea-
surements. I hung it on nothingness. I always command the morning.
I show the light and darkness to their placesâ€, and so on, the tone
(however justified the claims) would be tediously boastful. Instead,
God uses rhetorical questions that elicit knowledge from Job and the
reader, thereby making them participants in the depiction 48. The
J. LÉVÊQUE, “L’interprétation des discours de YHWH (Job 38,1–42,6)â€,
46
The Book of Job (ed. W.A.M. BEUKEN) (Leuven 1994) 203-223, at 213, 216,
likewise sees a diminution in the violence and hostility of these creatures.
See further FOX, “Job 38â€.
47
See also L.J. DE REGT, “Implications of Rhetorical Questions in Strophes
48
in Job 11 and 15â€, The Book of Job (ed. W.A.M. BEUKEN) (Leuven 1994) 321.
De Regt notes that, “[b]ecause the speaker implies more than the words as
such and expects no response, the hearer is impressed by the thought processes
that would logically lead to the kind of answer the speaker intends the hearer
to reachâ€.
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2012 - Tutti i diritti riservati