Michael V. Fox, «God's Answer and Job's Response», Vol. 94 (2013) 1-23
The current understanding of the Book of Job, put forth by M. Tsevat in 1966 and widely accepted, is that YHWH implicitly denies the existence of divine justice. Retribution is not part of reality, but only a delusion. The present article argues that the book teaches the need for fidelity in the face of divine injustice. The Theophany shows a God whose care for the world of nature hints at his care for humans. The reader, unlike Job, knows that Job's suffering is important to God, as establishing the possibility of true human loyalty.
17
GOD’S ANSWER AND JOB’S RESPONSE
morning, he can do and does what the result clauses say. God’s chal-
lenge to Job to trample down the wicked (40,12-13) likewise implies
that God can do this, not that he too is helpless. In any case, if God is
saying that he cannot defeat the wicked, he is presenting a form of
theodicy that is not considered in Job or elsewhere in the Bible: the
excuse of divine finitude. If, as Brenner says, the Theodicy demon-
strates “the pained inability of God to control evil†55, the book would
be an apology for divine failure. But that would empty the book of
meaning. The Prologue assumes that God has the option of not af-
flicting Job, and Job’s complaints assume that God could do better.
Moreover, God’s descriptions of his rule prove, as Job says in 42,2,
that God “can do everythingâ€.
God says nothing about rewarding the righteous. There is a false
symmetry between the two sides of the retribution equation, for it
could be the case that God punishes the wicked yet sometimes re-
fuses to give the righteous their due. This is, in fact, presumed in
the Prologue. On the one hand, the Adversary is going around look-
ing for the wicked to report to the divine judge, and on the other,
Job is unfairly afflicted. In the Theophany, God affirms the first as-
sertion of the equation, but does so almost en passant. The punish-
ment of the wicked is not the concern of this book. Still, God’s
beneficence toward his creatures somehow implies his punishment
of the wicked. Psalm 104 ends, “Sinners will disappear from the
earth, and the wicked be no more. O my soul, bless the Lord. Praise
the Lord†(v. 35). A connection of this sort seems to be in the back-
ground of the Theophany speeches, but it is not emphasized.
that Job cannot do — defeat Leviathan — without implying that YHWH actu-
ally did or does them. This passage does not allude to the defeat of Leviathan
at creation. The subjugation of Leviathan here is described by an array of in-
compatible images: being caught by barbs and harpoons, with his carcass
sold in the market, being forced into indentured servitude, and being tamed
and toyed with like a pet bird on a leash. The mythological Leviathan is killed
by blows from a club, and the other images in this passage are also clearly ir-
relevant to him.
BRENNER, “God’s Answerâ€, 134.
55
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2012 - Tutti i diritti riservati