Michael V. Fox, «God's Answer and Job's Response», Vol. 94 (2013) 1-23
The current understanding of the Book of Job, put forth by M. Tsevat in 1966 and widely accepted, is that YHWH implicitly denies the existence of divine justice. Retribution is not part of reality, but only a delusion. The present article argues that the book teaches the need for fidelity in the face of divine injustice. The Theophany shows a God whose care for the world of nature hints at his care for humans. The reader, unlike Job, knows that Job's suffering is important to God, as establishing the possibility of true human loyalty.
18 MICHAEL V. FOX
X. Job’s Repentance
To God’s description of the order and providence in his world dif-
ferent responses are possible. Job might, as Gordis suggests, find ease
for his pain in the harmony of the cosmos 56. In a sentence often cited
just to be brushed aside, Gordis says, “The beauty of the world becomes
an anodyne to man’s suffering — and the key to truth†57. In fact, Job
now has the additional discomfort of being chastised for speaking in
ignorance. Or he might feel even worse, seeing himself cruelly isolated
from the world’s beauty and God’s care 58. He could continue raging,
for he has nothing left to lose. But then he repents, in 42,6.
But why? After all, Job is the wronged party. (YHWH says as
much in 2,3.) In 40,4 Job prepares the way for his repentance by
saying he will keep silent, an act that typically signifies humility
and patience, as in the psalms 59. In 42,2-5, he declares God’s om-
nipotence and his own ignorance. His recognition of these traits,
which he had long known, is the sort of confession whereby one
takes to heart something he already knew. The profession of God’s
omnipotence is especially significant, because he may do things of
importance beyond what is visible. This the reader knows to be
true. Nevertheless, Job’s words on his way to repentance are often
dismissed as evasive or facetious and as merely the muttered res-
ignation of the helpless. Job’s repentance comes to a climax in his
declaration: rpaw rp[-l[ ytmxnw sama !k l[ (42,6).
Its meaning at least seems clear: “Therefore I am disgusted, and
I repent on dust and ashesâ€. If Job’s words were spoken by a psalmist,
no one would doubt that they express contrition. Still, the current
consensus holds that Job’s repentance is cagy and contrived, not re-
ally contrite.
R. GORDIS, The Book of God and Man (Chicago, IL 1965) 133. Gordis
56
states, in italics, the author’s basic conclusion: “just as there is order and har-
mony in the natural world, though imperfectly grasped by man, so there is order
and meaning in the moral sphere, though often incomprehensible to man†(133).
GORDIS, Book of God and Man, 133.
57
Those who think that ytmxn means “I am comforted†do not say that
58
Job is comforted by the beauty he has seen; that would make no sense with
“on dust and ashesâ€.
E.g., Pss 4,5; 32,3; 37,7; 38,14; 39,3.10; 50,21; 62,2.6; 131,2; cf. Isa
59
53,7. But silence can also be tactical, as in Judg 18,19 and Prov 17,20. On
Job’s silence, see NEWELL, “Jobâ€, 307-310.
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2012 - Tutti i diritti riservati