Paul Foster, «Is Q a 'Jewish Christian' Document?», Vol. 94 (2013) 368-394
Recent research has generated different hypotheses concerning the social location of Q. This discussion commences with an examination of scholarship on the phenomenon of 'Jewish Christianity' and theories concerning the social location of Q. Next, meta-level questions are addressed, concerning how social location is determined from a text. The discussion then considers four areas mentioned in Q that might be of potential significance for determining social location. These are references to synagogues, the law, Gentiles, and unbelieving Israel. In conclusion, the inclusive perspectives may suggest that the document had a more positive attitude toward Gentiles than is often stated.
03_Biblica_Foster_Layout 1 08/07/13 12:56 Pagina 374 03_B
374 PAUL FOSTER
By “Christian Jewsâ€, I mean Christian supporters who still main-
tained their place within Jewish and social society (if indeed one
can distinguish between the two!); by Jewish Christians, I mean
those who had, whether by choice or outside pressure, made the
move of setting up a “community†(at least in some sense) separate
from their Jewish contemporaries, even though maintaining the
highest level of continuity with their Jewish roots 27.
Arnal’s description of the Q community aligns even more closely
with that of Kloppenborg. Hence, scribalism, not itinerancy, is viewed
as the correct model for describing a Galilean village-based move-
ment. The social project of Q involves the wholesale rejection of hi-
erarchies, especially that of Jerusalem-focused religious power
structures 28. Arnal calls for a reconceptualization of the terms “Jewish
Christianity†or “Christian Judaismâ€. He sees the Jewish features be-
coming heightened with successive redactions of Q. Hence, Arnal
views Q as the product of a Jesus-based movement within Judaism.
This understanding of Q has enjoyed increased popularity over the
last couple of decades, but it does not represent a uniform consensus.
While Fleddermann’s position deviates from what is perhaps the
prevailing view, it is helpful to appreciate the way the text of Q can
be seen as reflecting a different social location. He states: “[t]he
cultural matrix Q rose out of remains hotly disputed. Does Q reflect
Cynicism, Judaism, Jewish Christianity, or Gentile Christianity�
Fleddermann rejects the first three categories, and instead views Q
as being read in gentile Christian contexts. He notes that Q attacks
Israel’s particularism, it promotes a universal approach to salvation,
it supports a flexible approach to the Law, it singles out Gentiles
as models of faith, views Israel as under judgment, and replaces
temple and Israel as places of true worship with a theology of the
kingdom of God. As a result, he concludes “[a]ll we can know
about the author of Q we have to infer from the work. The work
discloses a highly literate author, a native Greek-speaking Gentile
Christian living somewhere in the Mediterranean world […]†29.
TUCKETT, Q and the History of Early Christianity, 435, n. 37.
27
W.E. ARNAL, Jesus and the Village Scribes. Galilean Conflicts and the
28
Setting of Q (Minneapolis, MN 2001) 202.
H.T. FLEDDERMANN, Q: A Reconstruction and Commentary (Biblical
29
Tools and Studies 1; Leuven 2005) 161, 167.
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2013 - Tutti i diritti riservati