D.W. Kim, «Where Does It Fit? The Unknown Parables in the Gospel of Thomas», Vol. 94 (2013) 585-595
This article explores the genesis of some parables in the Gospel of Thomas not found elsewhere. They are not thematically related to each other. Then, how many parables exist in the text? In what way are they different or the same in comparison with the canonical Gospels? These parables in Thomas were not excluded from the concern of the post-1960s scholars, but the literary standard was not unified. The Greek fragments (P. Oxy. 654, 1, and 655) do not offer any crucial source in this case, but the Coptic manuscripts (NHC II, 2. 32-51) evince a new insight that the unknown parable tradition is not intended to show dependency on the canonical tradition; rather they commonly provide key evidence which proves the pre-gnostic Jewish sophia tradition.
07_Biblica_AN_Kim_Layout 1 16/12/13 12:29 Pagina 592
592 DAVID W. KIM
Lindemann says there is nothing allegorical about the parable, but he
insists that the narrative of Logion 98 “was constructed by the gnostic
community out of Jesus’ words†30. The scene of the parable can also be seen
within the unstable political situation which is indirectly expressed in the
Lukan parables of “the tower and the king†going to war (Lk 14,28-32).
Nevertheless, the non-allegorical perspective is sustained by the theory of
stylistic similarity, i.e., that Logion 98, like Logia 63-65, “begins with the
familiar datival formula: The Kingdom is like a woman/ man who …†31.
Stroker, with Higgins, not only maintains the view that “each of them had an
aphorism appendedâ€, but also maintains that there is “a definite tendency for
parables to be grouped in Thomas†32. The antagonistic scene where the weak
eventually overcome the environmental burden of dictatorship is seen in the
Exodus narrative where the Egyptians oppressed the Israelites for a long time.
According to the Jewish text of Exodus (3-15), Yahweh uses the leadership
of Moses to deliver the Israelites from their hardship. Moses with Aaron
encountered the authority of Pharaoh. However, the Israelites of the Jewish
narrative ultimately witnessed the defeat of the military power of the Egyptians
at the Red Sea. Here, one cannot deny the fact that the textual context of
Exodus in the liberation of Moses “is replaced with the themes of oppression,
resistance, bravery and the final overthrow of the powerful man†33, which
corresponds to the key point of the unknown Thomasine parable (Logion 98).
Morrice supports the view of the pre-gnostic Jewish tradition in his comment
that “the use of an immoral deed as an example does not militate against the
authenticity of the parable†34.
IV. Logion 109: The Parable of Hidden Treasure 35
Fourthly, the Jesus tradition of a rich old man in Logion 109 is a
mysterious parable in various ways 36: 1) the person who hid the treasure
30
A. LINDEMANN, “Zur Gleichnisinterpretation im Thomas-Evangelionâ€,
ZNW 71 (1980) 222, 226. DORAN, “A Complex of Parables, 349-352.
31
STROKER, “Extra canonical Parablesâ€, 99.
32
See DORAN, “A Complex of Parablesâ€, 99-100, 349-352. A.J.B. HIGGINS,
“Non-Gnostic Sayings in the Gospel of Thomas.†NovT 4 (1960) 304-305.
33
FORD, “Body Language,†295-307.
34
MORRICE, Hidden Sayings of Jesus, 82.
35
“Jesus said, the kingdom is like a man who had a [hidden] treasure in his
field without knowing it. And [after] he died, he left it to his [son]. The son [did]
not know (about the treasure). He inherited the field and sold [it]. And the one
who bought it went plowing and [found] the treasure. He began to lend money
at interest to whomever he wished†(NHC II, 2. 50:31–51:03).
36
Sider also confesses that “many plausible guesses†can be made