Nadav Sharon, «Herod's Age When Appointed Strategos of Galilee: Scribal Error or Literary Motif?», Vol. 95 (2014) 49-63
In Antiquities Josephus says that Herod was only fifteen-years-old when appointed strategos of Galilee in 47 BCE. This is often dismissed as scribal error and corrected to twenty-five, because it contradicts other Herodian biographical information. However, this unattested emendation does not fit the immediate context, whereas 'fifteen' does. This paper suggests that rather than a scribal error, this is a literary motif, presenting Herod as a particularly young military hero. The specific age of fifteen may have had a deeper intention, fictively linking Herod's birth to the year 63, the year of Augustus' birth and Pompey's conquest of the Temple.
03_Biblica_Sharon_Layout 1 01/04/14 11:46 Pagina 52
52 NADAV SHARON
pecially given that Josephus’ source for most of his information
about Herod was Nicolaus of Damascus 9, if this text has a legal
connotation it could only possibly be referring to Roman law. Re-
publican law stipulated that the minimum age for holding public
office was 27 or 30, and even older for some offices 10; so seem-
ingly twenty-five would have indeed been too young for such an
appointment. However, there were notable precedents of younger
people acquiring positions of authority during the Republic. One
prominent case was that of Scipio Africanus who was only twenty-
four years old when, in 211 BCE, he received command of Spain
during the Hannibalic War (Livy 26.18) 11. A more relevant excep-
tion to that age limitation is the election of Octavian (the later Au-
gustus) to the office of consul in 43 BCE, before his twentieth
birthday. Moreover, Augustus apparently reduced the minimum age
for holding public office to twenty-five 12, and according to Cassius
Dio 55.9.2 Augustus seems to have allowed for the possibility of
consuls from the age of twenty 13. Therefore, if Josephus (or Nico-
laus), who wrote later than Augustus’ reform, meant to say that
Herod was appointed at an age younger than that which was stipu-
lated by law, twenty-five would hardly have been relevant.
2. A Question of Competence and Experience
Josephus’ statement does not appear, in fact, to have anything to
do with age regulations. Josephus is not saying that Herod was
younger than some age limit. It seems, rather, that the second pos-
9
For Nicolaus as Josephus’ main source for Herod’s time (i.e., most of
War 1 and Ant. 14–17) see e.g., B.-Z. WACHOLDER, Nicolaus of Damascus
(Berkeley, CA 1962) 4-6 (with a brief sketch of scholarship) and 60-64;
SCHWARTZ, “Drama and Authenticityâ€; M. TOHER, “Nicolaus and Herod in
the Antiquitates Judaicaeâ€, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 101
(2003) 427-447; idem, “Herod, Augustus, and Nicolaus of Damascusâ€, Herod
and Augustus. Papers Presented at the IJS Conference, 21st-23rd June 2005
(eds. D.M. JACOBSON – N. KOKKINOS) (Leiden 2009) 65-81.
10
T. WIEDEMANN, Adults and Children in the Roman Empire (London
1989) 119; E. EYBEN, Restless Youth in Ancient Rome (trans. P. DALY; London
– New York 1993) 8-9.
11
Cf. EYBEN, Restless Youth, 47-48.
12
Cf. EYBEN, Restless Youth, 8-9, 68-69.
13
See also B. RAWSON, Children and Childhood in Roman Italy (Oxford
2003) 325.