Thijs Booij, «Psalm 118 and Form Criticism», Vol. 96 (2015) 351-374
Psalm 118 was recited in the time of Nehemiah. The speaker in the first person singular passages is Israel's representative. The psalm, a communal song of thankfulness, belongs to a group of texts related to Succoth (Psalms 65; 66; 67; 98; 107; 124; 129; Isaiah 12; 25,1-5). These texts, dating from the later post-exilic period, do not constitute a welldelineated literary genre. Psalm 118 and Isaiah 12; 25,1-5, however, constitute a special category. Psalm 118,24 refers to Succoth as the time when YHWH judges the world and decides on the nation's well-being (v. 25) for the year to come.
02_Booij_351_351_374 30/10/15 13:01 Pagina 354
354 THIJS BOOIJ 354
suited a cultic religion, and psalms were preserved in the temple
archive 14. When in the Persian period Mosaic Law became the
binding rule of Jewish life, poems expressing love of the Torah
were admitted among the psalms; one of them was even inserted
as the preface to the Psalter 15. A song like Psalm 19 may have been
offered as a votive offering in the sanctuary (see v. 15); the same
could apply to e.g. Psalm 104 (see v. 34). In fact there is, in my
view, no sharp dividing line between cultic and non-cultic texts. In
a strict sense, psalms may be called cultic if they had a function in
rituals carried out in the temple or, with the sanction of the cultic
officials, in other locations. The available data, however, will often
be insufficient to decide whether, indeed, a given psalm had such
a function originally.
Gunkel’s view of the relation between the psalms and the cult
is seriously flawed. No less problematic is his pursuit of an all-
embracing classification of the psalms. The strictness of the
classification presented in the Einleitung fails to do justice to the
variety of the texts. Exemplary is the category of Mischgedichte,
supposedly non-cultic poems made up of thoughts and forms from
different psalm types 16. I think that actually, on account of their
structure and modes of expression, and in spite of many traditional
forms, most of the texts involved may rank as new creations. The
problems of an exhaustive classification are also apparent in
Gunkel’s kleinere Gattungen. As representing the supposed genre of
the pilgrimage song only Psalm 122 is mentioned, Psalm 84 being
related to it. Other proposed genres, such as the beatitude, the legend
and the torah, are represented by parts of psalms or fragments. In the
present article attention will be given to the collective song of
thanksgiving, a type said to include Psalms 66,8-12; 67; 124; 129 17. F.
Crüsemann holds the view that these texts have too little in common
formally to constitute a literary genre — in which I think he is right.
14
In this context the affinity between the liturgical Psalm 118 and tradi-
tional songs of prayer and thanksgiving is significant. See below, sections IV
and VI.
15
W.O.E. OESTERLEY, The Psalms (London 1939) 119.
16
GUNKEL, Einleitung, 397-404, mentioning Psalms 9‒10; 19; 33; 90; 94;
119; 129; 139.
17
GUNKEL, Einleitung, 315. Isa 12,3-6 and Ps 13,1-3 are mentioned as
collective thanksgiving songs outside the book of Psalms; Isa 25,9, 2 Macc
15,34 and Jdt 13,14.17 as fragments belonging to the class.