James Swetnam, «The Context Of The Crux At Hebrews 5,7-8», Vol. 14 (2001) 101-120
An article in Biblica
by the present author outlined a proposed solution for the crux at Heb
5,7-8. The present article will attempt to put this proposed solution
in the general and particular context of the structure of the first six
chapters of the epistle. This contextualization should help indicate the
intention of the author of Hebrews and thus clarify and further commend
the proposed solution. The structure on which this contextualization is
based is, like the solution to the crux at Heb 5,7-8, a suggestion, to be
judged on the intrinsic merits or lack thereof of the arguments adduced.
The Context of the Crux at Hebrews 5, 7-8 109
d) Hebrews 5,1-10
Hard on the discussion of the lovgo~ as intercessor at Heb 4,14-16
there follows a section dedicated to a comparison and contrast between
the Aaronic high priesthood of the old dispensation and the high priest-
hood of Christ (5,1-10) 39. Helping to delimit the section are the framing
words ajrciereuv~ and qeov~ in vv. 1 and 10 40. It is in this section that the
crux 5,7-8 is found. The section will be discussed at length in the second
major part of this article. V. 10 has the air of a conclusion of one dis-
cussion and the beginning of another: prosagoreuqei;~ uJpo; tou` qeou`
arciereu~ kata; th;n tavxin Melcisevdek.
j ;
e) Hebrews 5,11 – 6,20
Heb 5,11 seems to begin a long section of paraenesis: the tone changes
from the impersonal exposition of 5,1-10 to the direct address of 5,11.
This direct speech continues on until 6,20, where the mention of
Melchizedek signals the discourse of 7,1-28 on this primordial figure.
Within 5,11 – 6,20 there is a division into negative warnings (5,11 – 6,8)
and a positive counterpart (6,9-20) 41. In the negative part occurs the
famous crux about the impossibility of repentance (6,4-6) 42. Because of
their extended length and paraenetic nature, these two passages suggest
that they are the conclusion of the major section beginning at Heb 3,6.
The end of this major section is indicated by the change in subject mat-
ter and tone occurring at Heb 7,1 43.
The suggestion that Heb 5,11 – 6,20 refers back to the entire section
beginning at 3,6 would seem to be confirmed by the way the author plays
upon the theme of ‘promise’. At 4,1 he had already referred to the
entrance into the ‘rest’ as being the result of a ‘promise’ 44. At Heb 6,12
this theme is explicitly picked up and linked with the matching theme of
‘inheritance’ 45. The addressees are urged to take as their models those
who ‘through faith and perseverance have inherited the promises’ (. . . dia;
pistew~ kai; makroqumiva~ klhronomouvntwn ta;~ ejpaggeliva"). The
v
39
Cf. Swetnam, «Hebrews 3,7 – 10,39», 135-136.
40
Cf. J. Kurianal, Jesus Our High Priest: Ps 110,4 As The Substructure of Heb 5,1 –
7,28 (European University Studies, Series XXIII, Theology, 693; Frankfurt am
Main–Berlin–Bern–Bruxelles–New York–Wien 2000), 81.
41
Cf. Swetnam, «Hebrews 3,7 – 10,39», 135-137.
42
For an attempt to solve this crux cf. Swetnam, «Hebrews 3,7 – 10,39», 136.
43
Cf. Swetnam, «Hebrews 3,7 – 10,39», 137.
44
The ‘promise’ in Heb 4,1 is contained implicitly in the final verse of the citation of
Ps 95,7-11 found at Heb 3,11. Cf. Ellingworth, Hebrews, 238.
45
For Christ as ‘heir’ cf. already Heb 1,2 and 1,4. For Christians as ‘heirs’ cf. Heb
1,14.