James Swetnam, «The Context Of The Crux At Hebrews 5,7-8», Vol. 14 (2001) 101-120
An article in Biblica
by the present author outlined a proposed solution for the crux at Heb
5,7-8. The present article will attempt to put this proposed solution
in the general and particular context of the structure of the first six
chapters of the epistle. This contextualization should help indicate the
intention of the author of Hebrews and thus clarify and further commend
the proposed solution. The structure on which this contextualization is
based is, like the solution to the crux at Heb 5,7-8, a suggestion, to be
judged on the intrinsic merits or lack thereof of the arguments adduced.
James Swetnam
114
2. Hebrews 5,1-10 in Its Context in Hebrews
a) The Relation of Hebrews 5,1-10 to the Sacrifice of Isaac
In the suggested structure of Heb 3,7 – 6,20 given above, the verses
4,12-13 are central because of their focus on the lovgo~ as the pervasive
agent for the attainment of the promises made to Abraham of spiritual-
ized land and spiritualized progeny. Heb 4,13 contains an allusion to the
sacrifice of Isaac under the image of an outstretched neck waiting for the
sacrificial knife (tetrachlismevna). In the interpretation of Heb 5,7-8
which serves as the occasion of the present article, the ‘offering’ of Jesus
‘with a loud cry and tears of prayers and petitions to the one able to save
Him from death’ (dehvsei~ te kai; iJkethriva~ pro;~ to;n dunavmenon
swzein aujton ejk qanavtou meta; kraugh`~ ijscura`~ kai; dakruvwn
v/
prosenegka") was said to take place on the cross when He cited the
v
opening verse of Ps 22 as an indication of His willingness to undergo the
fate of the protagonist of the psalm and not be saved by a divine inter-
vention through Elijah.64 The fact that He was ‘heard although Son’
(eisakousqei~ . . . kaivper w]n uiJov") was attributed in part to an implied
j ;
contrast with the Aqedah in Heb 11,17-19 65.
A problem with this interpretation is that in Hebrews there is no appar-
ent indication that Isaac willingly offered himself as a sacrifice: in the text of
the Aqedah at Gen 22,1-18 he seems to be purely passive and this passivity
seems to be the background of the use of Gen 22 at Heb 11,17-19. Thus the
imagery of Heb 4,13, if understood against this background, would argue
for a purely passive attitude on the part of Isaac. But this problem can be
solved if one takes the free-will offering of Jesus in Heb 5,7-8 as an indica-
tion that the author of Hebrews was referring to the tradition current in
Judaism at the time that Isaac offered himself willingly at the Aqedah.
Though Gen 22,1-18 as it stands in the biblical text gives no indica-
tion that Isaac took an active part in the sacrifice 66, by the first century
A.D. the tradition accompanying this scriptural account had developed in
Jewish tradition to the point where Isaac freely offers himself as a sacrifi-
cial victim. This is clear in 4 Maccabees 13,12 and at 16,20, where Isaac’s
comportment is invoked as an example to be imitated by Jews when
tempted to renounce their faith 67. The same tradition is found in Pseudo-
64
Cf. Swetnam, «Hebrews 5,7-8», 353-355.
65
Swetnam, «Hebrews 5,7-8», 356.
66
But cf. the argument of H. C. White that the sacrifice of Isaac by Abraham origi-
nally represented a rite of initiation in which Isaac is made to face death and to accept
it (H. C. White, «The Initiation Legend of Isaac», ZAW 91 [1979] 1-30).
67
Cf.: J. Swetnam, Jesus and Isaac: A Study of the Epistle to the Hebrews in the Light of
the Aqedah (AnBib 94; Rome 1981), 46; J. Levenson, The Death and Resurrrection of the
Beloved Son: The Transformation of Child Sacrifice in Judaism and Christianity (New
Haven–London 1993), 187-187. Levenson dates 4 Maccabees to between 18 and 55 A.D.