86 Josep Rius-Camps and Jenny Read-Heimerdinger According to D05, Peter omits to mention this instruction when he reports to brethren in Jerusalem what the Holy Spirit said to him in Caesarea. (ἦλθον) δέ B P74 ) rell ‖ om. D (d) 1838 . D05 has another sentence (cf. 11:9 above) that has no connecting word linking it to the previous one. 13 (εἶδεν) τὸν ἄγγελον B P74 ) A E 33. 1739 M co ‖ ἄγγ. D P45 Ψ. The article in B03 is anomalous since the angel has not been mentioned before by Peter. (εἰπόντα) αὐτῷ D d E H L P Ψ 049. 056. 33. 1739 M latt sy ‖ om. B P74 ) A 6. 81 pc. It happens with some frequency that D05 specifies the addressee of a speech where the AT does not; it is typical for the dative case to be used rather than πρόϛ + accusative when a conversation is related by a third party58. 15 (λαλεῖν) αὐτοῖϛ D d p vgS aeth; Aug ‖ om. B P74 ) rell. The comment on the previous vl is equally valid here, too. ἐπέπεσεν B P74 ) rell ‖ ἔπεσεν D, cecidit d. This same variant was found in the parallel verse in the narrator’s account, 10:44. On both these occasions in D05, but on no others, the simple verb is used rather than the compound to express the coming of the Spirit. ἐπ’ αὐτούϛ B P74 ) DB rell, super eos d ‖ ἐπ’ αὐτοῖϛ D*. The accusative of B03 matches the accusative in the following clause, ἐφ’ ἡμᾶϛ, and corresponds to the parallel account of 10:44 (ἐπὶ πάνταϛ). The dative of D05 would not normally be used with ἐπί after a verb of movement but there is another occurrence of πίπτω with ἐπί + dative at 20:10 D05. ὥσπερ (καὶ ἐφ’ ἡμᾶϛ) B P74 ) rell ‖ ὡϛ D. The variant was also noted at 10:47, the parallel verse of the previous scene though there the situation was the reverse, for D05 was the sole witness to read ὡσπερ and all other MSS read ὡϛ. According to B03, Read-Heimerdinger, The Bezan Text, 176-78; 181-82. 58