Sjef van Tilborg, «The Danger at Midday: Death Threats in the Apocalypse», Vol. 85 (2004) 1-23
This paper proposes a new suggestion in the discussion regarding possible death threats in the Apocalypse. It makes a comparison between relevant texts from the Apocalypse and what happens during festival days when rich civilians entertain their co-citizens with (gladiatorial) games. At the end of the morning and during the break special fights are organized. Condemned persons are forced to fight against wild animals or against each other to be killed by the animals or by fire. The paper shows that a number of texts from the Apocalypse are better understood, when they are read against this background.
The Danger at Midday: Death Threats in the Apocalypse 3
one should note that, while it is true that the book’s revelation is a
prophetic denunciation of the fundamental incompatibility that exists
between the pagan religion on which the Roman empire is based on
the one hand and the Christian faith on the other, this does not in any
way imply the absence of all risks entailed by faithfulness to the Lord
Jesus Christ, risks which are mentioned many times in the book of
Revelation, in terms that are barely veiled (6).
I would like to concur with this grandmaster in the exegesis of the
Apocalypse. By making a comparison between what happens at the
munera, the games which are organized by the rich as filotimiva (7) and
the text of the Apocalypse, I want to show where P. Prigent is right in
talking about the risks which in the Apocalypse are mentioned in terms
which are barely veiled.
1. The munera
The gladiatorial games which are a part of the munera enjoy great
scholarly interest (8). Originally these games were connected with the
death of an important public figure as tribute to the deceased. At the
end of the Republic (through Sulla, Pompey, Caesar and Anthony) they
are also put into service in the internal political struggle to win popular
(6) P. PRIGENT, Commentary on the Apocalypse of St. John (Tübingen 2001)
74.
(7) According to L. ROBERT, Les gladiateurs dans l’Orient Grec (Amsterdam
1971) 277-280 the words munus and filotimiva become fully synonymous in the
course of the second-third century.
(8) See e.g. A. ROLAND, Cruelty and Civilization. The Roman Games (London
– New York 1972); A. CAMERON, Circus Factions. Blues and Greens at Rome
and Byzantium (Oxford 1976); K.M. COLEMAN, “Fatal Charades: Roman
Executions Staged as Mythological Enactmentsâ€, Journal of Roman Studies 80
(1990) 44-73; Th. WIEDEMANN, Emperors and Gladiators (London – New York
1992); M. CARTMILL, A View to Death in the Morning. Hunting and Nature
through History (Cambridge, MA 1993); C.A. BARTON, The Sorrows of the
Ancient Romans. The Gladiator and the Monster (Princeton, NJ 1993); P. PLASS,
The Game of Death in Ancient Rome. Arena Sport and Political Suicide
(Wisconsin – London 1995); D.G. KYLE, Spectacles of Death in Ancient Rome
(London – New York 1998); F. MEIJER, Gladiatoren. Volksvermaak in het
Colosseum (Amsterdam 2003). For this paper the book of L. ROBERT, Les
gladiateurs dans l’Orient Grec is obviously the most important. In citing the
inscriptions I write ROBERT + number (= the number that Robert gave to the
inscription in his study). When I refer to the pages, I write ROBERT, Gladiateurs +
number. With the cities from the Apocalypse I have also indicated always the
most up-to-date or the first publication. I have completed and corrected the
inscriptions of Robert by the texts from the Supplementum Epigraphicum
Graecum (SEG) from 1971-1998.