Cornelis Bennema, «The Sword of the Messiah and the Concept of Liberation in the Fourth Gospel», Vol. 86 (2005) 35-58
This article elucidates the Johannine concept of Jesus’
"sword" as the means of liberation against a background of Palestinian messianic
apocalypticism. It is argued that the Johannine Jesus is depicted as a messiah
who liberates the world at large from the spiritual oppression of sin and the
devil by means of his Spirit-imbued word of truth. In addition, Jesus also
provides physical, social, religious and political liberation. Jesus’ programme
of holistic liberation is continued by his disciples through the transference of
his "sword" in the form of their Paraclete-imbued witness.
The Sword of the Messiah 43
execution of the messiah’s enemies by the jwr of his lips can be
directly related or attributed to God’s support of the messiah with the
Spirit of might. 4Q534 col 1,8-10; 2,7-16 probably alludes to Isaiah
11 and 42 when it depicts God’s Chosen One filled with wisdom and
knowledge who will cause destruction by the jwr of his breath (25).
The picture that emerges from these texts is that of a Spirit-
empowered Davidic messiah rooted in Isaiah 11 (and 42) who will sift
the righteous and the wicked through the jwr of his mouth. The issue
then is the nature of what exactly comes out of the messiah’s mouth,
indicated by wytpc jwr in Isa 11,4. The word hpc can mean “lip†but
also “speechâ€, and the semantic domain of jwr contains both “breathâ€
and “Spiritâ€, so that the expression wytpc jwr may simply mean “the
breath of his lips†but it can also refer to the messiah’s Spirit-imbued
word. There are good reasons to assume that probably both references
are in view. First, the wisdom and knowledge provided by the Spirit in
Isa 11,2 probably form the basis for the messiah’s Spirit-imbued
speech in Isa 11,4. Moreover, the powerful effect of the messiah’s
words in Isa 11,4 should probably also be attributed to this Spirit of
might of Isa 11,2. Second, the LXX translation of Isa 11,4 explicitly
states that words come out of the messiah’s mouth (oJ lovgo" tou'
stovmato" aujtou'), and the intended parallelism with pneu'ma ceilevwn
suggests that these words are Spirit-infused. Hence, we may conclude
that the means of the messiah’s sifting the righteous and the wicked is
his Spirit-imbued word.
Other writings rather highlight a messiah with a teaching role.
4Q175 5-13 speaks both of the eschatological Prophet who will bring
God’s revelatory teaching (with negative consequences for those who
reject it) and of a royal-political messiah who will execute judgment,
and lines 14-20 present the idea of a priestly messiah who will
teach the law. The teaching function implicit in the epithet “the
Interpreter/Teacher of the law†in CD 7,18 and 4Q174 f1 col 1,11
probably refers to the same priestly messianic figure (26). 4Q541 f7 4-
(25) É. Puech interprets the entire expression yhwmçn jwr in col 1,10; 2,7 as “his
Spirit†(Qumrân Grotte 4.XXII. Textes araméens première partie 4Q529-549
[DJD 31; Oxford 2001] 134, 143, 146).
(26) Cf. M.A. KNIBB, The Qumran Community (Cambridge 1987) 264-266;
COLLINS, Scepter, 114-115. P.R. Davies argues that the Damascus community
expected only a single teacher-messiah and not a dual or Davidic messiahship
(“Judaisms in the Dead Sea Scrolls: The Case of the Messiahâ€, The Dead Sea
Scrolls in Their Historical Context [eds. T.H. LIM et al.] [Edinburgh 2000] 219-
232). However, the diarchic view remains widely held.