Wim J.C. Weren, «The Macrostructure of Matthew’s Gospel: A New Proposal», Vol. 87 (2006) 171-200
The weakness of the proposals concerning the macrostructure of Matthew’s
Gospel made by Bacon and Kingsbury is that they depart from rigid caesuras,
whilst a typical characteristic of the composition of this Gospel is the relatively
smooth flow of the story. On the basis of the discovery that the various
topographical data are clustered together by means of three refrains we can
distinguish three patterns in the travels undertaken by Jesus. This rather coarse
structure is further refined with the use of Matera’s and Carter’s distinction
between kernels and satellites. Kernels are better labelled as “hinge texts”. The
following pericopes belong to this category: 4,12-17; 11,2-30; 16,13-28; 21,1-17;
26,1-16. Each of them marks a turning point in the plot and has a double function:
a hinge text is not only fleshed out in the subsequent pericopes but also refers to
the preceding block. It is especially these “hinge texts” that underline the
continuity of Matthew’s narrative and should prevent us from focussing too much
on alleged caesuras.
The Macrostructure of Matthew’s Gospel 181
a) Temporal information
The book of Matthew covers the period round the birth of Jesus up
till his resurrection from the dead. This juncture is expanded further
backward and forward by means of references to the past
(retrospections) and to the future (anticipations). The farthest point in
the past to be mentioned in Matthew is the creation of the world
(19,4.8), and the furthest point in the future is the coming of the Son of
Man (24,3.27.29.39) or the end of the age (13,39.40.49; 24,3; 28,20).
Twice, the narrator indicates that, from a temporal point of view, he
stands at great distance from the events that he narrates. In 27,8 and
28,15, he mentions two phenomena that originate in the period
described in the book but that “to this day†are still well-known or
influential.
There are a number of indications that give an idea of the temporal
organisation of Matthew’s story about Jesus. In 1,2-17, the history of
Israel is reviewed, starting with Abraham and culminating in Jesus. The
episodes in 1,18–2,23 take place towards the end of the rule of Herod
the Great and at the beginning of Archelaus’ administration. There is a
long time-span between the establishment of the young Jesus in
Nazareth (2,22-23) and the ministry of John the Baptist (3,1) (20). An
unspecified period of time passes between the temptation of Jesus in
the desert (4,1-11) and the time when he decides to go and live in
Capernaum (4,12-17). The summaries in 4,23 and 9,35 characterize in
a few strokes of the pen the activities of Jesus in Galilee during a long
period of time. In 11,12-13, a review of the history that has been told so
far is to be found; the retroversion formulated here refers back to John’s
ministry as narrated in 3,1-17 (ajpo; de; tw'n hJmerw'n jIwavnnou tou'
baptistou' e{w" a[rti ...); together, John and Jesus have made the
kingdom of heaven accessible, whilst “until John came†(e{w" jIwavnnou)
it was predicted by all the Prophets and the Torah (21). In 11,25, we
come across the time adjunct ejn ejkeivnw/ tw/' kairw'/, that is then repeated
twice (12,1 and 14,1). This formula indicates that the time has come
when Jesus confronts those around him with the necessity to make
(20) G. HÄFNER, “‘Jene Tage’ (Mt 3,1) und die Umfang des matthäischen
‘Prologs’â€, BZ 37 (1993) 51, challenges the idea that there is a deep caesura
between 2,23 and 3,1 and he considers the “in those days†used in 3,1 to be a
“Verknüpfung von für den Evangelisten zeitlich zusammengehörenden
Ereignissenâ€.
(21) In 11,12, ajpov has an inclusive meaning and, in 11,13, e{w" has an
exclusive one.