Huub van de Sandt, «James 4,1-4 in the Light of the Jewish Two Ways
Tradition 3,1-6», Vol. 88 (2007) 38-63
The author of the Letter of James accuses his readers (Jas 4,1-4) of being responsible for war, murder and adultery. How are we to explain this charge? This paper shows that the material in Jas 1,13-21; 2,8-11 and 4,1-4 is closely akin to
the teknon section in Did 3,1-6. The teknon section belonged to the Jewish Two Ways tradition which, for the most part, is covered by the first six chapters of the
Didache. Interestingly, Did 3,1-6 exhibits close affinity with the ethical principles of a particular stream of Rabbinic tradition found in early Derekh Erets treatises. James 4,1-4 should be considered a further development of the warnings in Did 3,1-6.
James 4,1-4 in the Light
of the Jewish Two Ways Tradition 3,1-6
The close resemblances between the different versions of the Two
Ways (including Did 1–6, Barn 18–20 and the Doctrina Aposto-
lorum) (1) are generally explained in modern research by their — direct
or indirect — dependence upon an earlier Jewish Two Ways document
which is no longer known to us. The late David Flusser and I recently
attempted to reconstruct this original teaching. Because this source
was in Greek, the document may also be called the Greek Two
Ways (2). For our purpose, it is important to establish that this
(hypothetical) version generally reflects the precise wording of the
Two Ways in the Didache, except for the Christianised sections,
1,3b–2,1 and 6,2-3 (3). In this paper, therefore, the Christian Didache
will be followed excluding those parts and details differing from the
hypothesized Greek Two Ways.
In the first century of our era, the doctrine of the Two Ways was
employed within Christian circles in pre-baptismal instruction (4). This
is explicitly stated in Did 7,1 in a verse that follows right after the
rendering of the Two Ways section: “Concerning baptism, baptize as
follows: after having previously said these things (tau'ta pavnta
(1) There are also later recensions of the Two Ways tradition which include
church orders, letters, and monastic writings. These recensions are represented by
the Apostolic Church Order, the Epitome of the Canons of the Holy Apostles, the
Life of Shenoute, the Ps. Athanasian Syntagma Doctrinae, and the Fides
CCCXVIII Patrum.
(2) For the above information and a reconstruction of the Greek Two Ways
(GTW), see H. VAN DE SANDT – D. FLUSSER, The Didache. Its Jewish Sources and
its Place in Early Judaism and Christianity (CRI III/5; Assen – Minneapolis 2002)
112-139.
(3) In the Letter of Barnabas and the Doctrina Apostolorum there are no
passages that parallel the materials in Did 1,3a–2,1 and Did 6,2-3. For further
details on the establishment of an earlier form of the Two Ways and its versions in
early Christian literature, see VAN DE SANDT – FLUSSER, The Didache, 55-80; 238-
270.
(4) By this I do not mean, however, that the use of the Two Ways teaching
was solely restricted to catechetical instruction prior to baptism. That it was used
otherwise as well is shown by its insertion into the Letter of Barnabas, which was
written to baptized Christians.