Huub van de Sandt, «James 4,1-4 in the Light of the Jewish Two Ways
Tradition 3,1-6», Vol. 88 (2007) 38-63
The author of the Letter of James accuses his readers (Jas 4,1-4) of being responsible for war, murder and adultery. How are we to explain this charge? This paper shows that the material in Jas 1,13-21; 2,8-11 and 4,1-4 is closely akin to
the teknon section in Did 3,1-6. The teknon section belonged to the Jewish Two Ways tradition which, for the most part, is covered by the first six chapters of the
Didache. Interestingly, Did 3,1-6 exhibits close affinity with the ethical principles of a particular stream of Rabbinic tradition found in early Derekh Erets treatises. James 4,1-4 should be considered a further development of the warnings in Did 3,1-6.
James 4,1-4 in the Light of the Jewish Two Ways Tradition 3,1-6 47
Jas 1,19-21 exhibits a pattern strikingly similar to 1 Peter
1,23–2,2 (29). The fact that James and 1 Peter share the word “to put
away†(ajpotivqemai) even supports the idea that they rely upon a
common tradition. All filthiness, rJupariva, metaphorically indicating
evil habits and inclinations, must be discarded like filthy garments (Jas
2,2) and the “implanted word†which is able to save must be “received
in meekness†(1,21). The Greek noun prau?vth" (“meeknessâ€) is
contrasted with ojrghv (“angerâ€) rather than with kakiva"
(“wickednessâ€) (30). Verses 1,16-18 and 1,19-21 confirm that the “logos
of truth†and “the implanted logos†are one and the same (31). The
“implanted word†does not refer to an inborn, natural quality within
man but to wisdom as the greatest gift of God (32). It descends from
above (3,15; cf. 1,17). The person is being regenerated and reborn by
the word of truth (1,18) as well as transformed by the implanted word
(1,21).
3. Jas 1,13-21 in the Light of Did 3,1-6
Particularly similar to James’ teaching in 1,13-15.19-21 is the so-
called teknon section in Did 3,1-6 which belongs to the Greek Two
Ways (33). At first sight one is inclined to consider the verses of the
(29) For further details, see also M.-E. BOISMARD, “Une liturgie baptismale
dans la prima Petri. II. – Son influence sur l’épître de Jacquesâ€, RB 64 (1957) 161-
183; esp. 167-172.
(30) DIBELIUS, James, 112; HARTIN, James, 97. Cf. JOHNSON, The Letter of
James, 270.
(31) “The identification of the ‘logos’ of truth and the ‘implanted logos’ is
widely assumedâ€; cf. JACKSON-MCCABE, Logos and Law, 214, n. 91. See also
BAUCKHAM, James, 146; HARTIN, James and the Q Sayings, 106, 213; JOHNSON,
The Letter of James, 287; HARTIN, James, 106.
(32) “From 1:5 and 1:17, the reader recognizes this ‘wisdom from above’ as
the wisdom that comes from God, indeed as the ‘word of truth’ that comes from
God (1:18) and, as ‘implanted word’, is to be received in ‘meekness’(1:21)â€; see
JOHNSON, The Letter of James, 287 and compare 218; cf. HARTIN, James and the
Q Sayings, 106-107, 213; DAVIDS, The Epistle of James, 51-55; HARTIN, James,
79-80 and WALL, Community of the Wise, 67.
(33) The teknon section is missing, however, in the Letter of Barnabas. On the
other hand, it is found in the Didache, Doctrina Apostolorum (though this version
lacks a counterpart to Did 3,3-4a), the Apostolic Church Order, the Epitome of
the Canons of the Holy Apostles, the Life of Shenoute, etc. It may be argued with
equal reason, therefore, that Barnabas, who probably rewrote his source, did not
preserve these materials. See also VAN DE SANDT-FLUSSER, The Didache, 73-74,
133-134.