Huub van de Sandt, «James 4,1-4 in the Light of the Jewish Two Ways
Tradition 3,1-6», Vol. 88 (2007) 38-63
The author of the Letter of James accuses his readers (Jas 4,1-4) of being responsible for war, murder and adultery. How are we to explain this charge? This paper shows that the material in Jas 1,13-21; 2,8-11 and 4,1-4 is closely akin to
the teknon section in Did 3,1-6. The teknon section belonged to the Jewish Two Ways tradition which, for the most part, is covered by the first six chapters of the
Didache. Interestingly, Did 3,1-6 exhibits close affinity with the ethical principles of a particular stream of Rabbinic tradition found in early Derekh Erets treatises. James 4,1-4 should be considered a further development of the warnings in Did 3,1-6.
54 Huub van de Sandt
moral codes in the Derekh Erets tractates (47). Oral tracts with subjects
concerning Derekh Erets existed as early as the second century CE and
part of these writings reflect the teachings of the pious on moral
behaviour (48). These men constituted a concrete group within the
society of the rabbis, practising charities, performing deeds of
lovingkindness, and possessing virtues of dedication to humility and
modesty. The treatise Yir’at Het (“fear of transgressionâ€), a separate
denotation of chapters I-IV and IX of the Derekh Erets Zuta, probably
dates from Tannaitic times (49). It states:
Keep aloof from everything hideous and from whatever seems
hideous (50) (wl hmwdh ˆmw rw[ykh ˆm qjrh) lest others suspect you of
transgression (Yir’at Het I,13) (51).
(47) Cf. G. KLEIN, Der älteste christliche Katechismus und die jüdische
Propaganda-Literatur (Berlin 1909) 69: “Die kürzeste Formel für Derech erez
lautet: Halte dich fern von der Sünde und von dem, was hässlich istâ€.
(48) The early layer reflects a life-style which is called “derekh hasidutâ€, the
way of the pious. It reveals the teaching of the early Hassidim who “placed
extreme stress on self-deprival and the performance of good deeds and acts of
loving kindness in lieu of pure academic ‘ivory tower’ scholarshipâ€; M. B.
LERNER, “The External Tractatesâ€, The Literature of the Sages (ed. S. SAFRAI)
(CRI II/ 3; Assen – Maastricht – Philadelphia 1987) I, 367-404; esp. 380. See also
S. SAFRAI, “Teaching of Pietists in Mishnaic Literatureâ€, JJS 16 (1965) 15-33;
esp. 25-28; ID., “Hasidim we-Anshei Maaseâ€, Zion 50 (1984-1985) 133-154; ID.,
“Jesus and the Hasidimâ€, Jerusalem Perspective 42-44 (1994) 3-22; ID., “Jesus
and the Hasidic Movement†(Hebr.), The Jews in the Hellenistic-Roman World.
Studies in Memory of Menahem Stern (eds. I.M. GAFNI – A. OPPENHEIMER – D.R.
SCHWARTZ) (Jerusalem 1996) 413-436. See also VAN DE SANDT – FLUSSER, The
Didache, 165-169 and 172-173.
(49) The early (Tannaitic) part of Yir’at Het is identical with Massechet
Derekh Erets Zuta, Chaps. I–III (minus I,18-20), edited by M. VAN LOOPIK, The
Ways of the Sages and the Way of the World (TSAJ 26; Tübingen 1991) 172-251
(with commentary) = Massekhet Derekh Eretz, Chaps. I–II, edited by M. HIGGER,
The Treatises Derek Erez: Masseket Derek Erez; Pirke Ben Azzai; Tosefta Derek
Erez (New York 1935; repr. Jerusalem 1970) I, 55-96 (Hebr.) and II, 33-42
(English translation). Cf. VAN LOOPIK, The Ways, 9 and 16-17.
(50) The rule of refraining from anything hideous (rw[yk) reflects a strongly
ethical approach, an attitude that is inspired by a deeply rooted fear of sin. For the
term rw[yk (“uglinessâ€) as ethically offensive, see the warning in Seder Eliahu
Rabba, Chap. 2: “for ugly things (µyr[wkm µyrbd) that aren’t fitting†(cf. M.
FRIEDMANN, Seder Eliahu Rabba and Seder Eliahu Zuta [Jerusalem 1969] 13); cf.
also SER, Chap. 25 (cf. ibid., 139); Chap. 7 (cf. ibid., 32); Chap. 14 (cf. ibid., 67);
Chap. 18 (cf. ibid., 104). The term corresponds with the literal meaning of its
Greek counterpart in Jas 1,21: dio; ajpoqevmenoi pa'san rJuparivan (“therefore,
having put away all filthiness…â€).
(51) According to VAN LOOPIK, The Ways, 194-197 (with commentary) =