Huub van de Sandt, «James 4,1-4 in the Light of the Jewish Two Ways
Tradition 3,1-6», Vol. 88 (2007) 38-63
The author of the Letter of James accuses his readers (Jas 4,1-4) of being responsible for war, murder and adultery. How are we to explain this charge? This paper shows that the material in Jas 1,13-21; 2,8-11 and 4,1-4 is closely akin to
the teknon section in Did 3,1-6. The teknon section belonged to the Jewish Two Ways tradition which, for the most part, is covered by the first six chapters of the
Didache. Interestingly, Did 3,1-6 exhibits close affinity with the ethical principles of a particular stream of Rabbinic tradition found in early Derekh Erets treatises. James 4,1-4 should be considered a further development of the warnings in Did 3,1-6.
60 Huub van de Sandt
each including a cause and effect (63). Luke T. Johnson has
demonstrated that in Hellenistic literature “envy†(fqovno") and
“jealousy†(zh'lo") inevitably lead to hostile acts, such as quarrels,
wars, and murder (64). The latter concepts are standard features of this
topos. In fact, envy is constantly associated with wars and battles.
For our purposes, however, it is of far greater importance to note
that the above Hellenistic topos closely corresponds with the form of
moral exhortation in the teknon passage. The connection between
envy, jealousy, and murder is also found in Did 3,1-6. As seen above,
the latter section is bent on highlighting that the transgression of minor
precepts leads to the transgression of major ones. In Jas 4,2 the same
path is depicted: “desire eventuates in murder†and “jealousy results
in warâ€. In addition to these statements, a psychological judgment is
also found here explaining the transition from a minor to a major sin.
The additions “(you) do not have†and “(you) are unable to obtain†in
4,2 indicate that desires for pleasure and passions are unsatisfied and
thus eventually lead to murder, social upheaval, battles and war.
James’ awareness of a tradition like the teknon section is evidenced
not only in Jas 4,1-2 but also in the entire arrangement of Jas 4,1-4.
The author reserves some of his harshest invectives for those who
pursue their own desires, addressing them as “adulteressesâ€
(moicalivde"). In Did 3,2-3 being angry, jealous, eager for battle and
hot-tempered are all connected to murder, while a lascivious or lustful
person (ejpiqumhthv") is tied to adultery (moiceiva) (65) — these are the
(63) A similar punctuation can also be found in J.B. MAYOR, The Epistle of St.
James. The Greek Text with Introduction, Notes and Comments (1897; repr.
Grand Rapids 1954) 134-137; J.H. ROPES, The Epistle of St James (ICC;
Edinburgh 1916) 254; JOHNSON, The Letter of James, 267, 277 etc.
(64) “James 3:13–4:10 and the Topos peri; fqovnouâ€, NT 25 (1983) 327-347;
repr. in L.T. JOHNSON, Brother of Jesus, 182-201; ID., The Letter of James, 277.
See also JACKSON-MCCABE, Logos and Law, 201-202; LAWS, A Commentary on
the Epistle of James, 171.
(65) Unlike the variety of minor transgressions in the two halves of the
separate strophes, the same serious offence is repeatedly retained in each of the
two halves, with the exception of 3,3, where the grave sin is expressed in two
different words (“fornication†and “adulteryâ€). It is, however, hard to believe that
the term “fornication†was used in the earlier layer of GTW 3,1-6. The word
porneiva is commonly a translation of the Hebrew term twnz or a related form,
which is used as technical terminology for prostitution. In the Torah — both oral
and written — prostitution (twnz) is prohibited when sexual intercourse is involved
with a cultic and / or commercial prostitute. There is no condemnation of sexual
relations that do not violate the marriage bond. Pre-marital, non-commercial
sexual intercourse between man and woman is not considered a moral crime in