Huub van de Sandt, «James 4,1-4 in the Light of the Jewish Two Ways
Tradition 3,1-6», Vol. 88 (2007) 38-63
The author of the Letter of James accuses his readers (Jas 4,1-4) of being responsible for war, murder and adultery. How are we to explain this charge? This paper shows that the material in Jas 1,13-21; 2,8-11 and 4,1-4 is closely akin to
the teknon section in Did 3,1-6. The teknon section belonged to the Jewish Two Ways tradition which, for the most part, is covered by the first six chapters of the
Didache. Interestingly, Did 3,1-6 exhibits close affinity with the ethical principles of a particular stream of Rabbinic tradition found in early Derekh Erets treatises. James 4,1-4 should be considered a further development of the warnings in Did 3,1-6.
44 Huub van de Sandt
members� He locates the origin of strife in the pursuit of pleasure (21).
The Greek text of the subsequent verse (Jas 4,2) is punctuated in the
twenty-seventh revised edition of Nestle-Aland with commas dividing
the sentence into three statements: “You desire (ejpiqumei'te) and do not
have, you murder and are jealous (zhlou'te) and are unable to obtain,
you battle and wage warâ€. The word ejpiqumei'n (and ejpiqumiva) does
not always have a bad meaning (Luke 22,15; Phil 1,23), but here, as
most often in the New Testament, it refers to egocentric, illicit desire.
It might therefore be preferable to translate ejpiqumei'te as “you desire
evilly†(22). The meanings of zhlou'n and zh'lo" are equally important
here. Although zhlou'n is itself neutral, it surely has a negative
connotation here, expressing “jealousyâ€, “envyâ€. The expression “you
are jealous†(zhlou'te) deliberately picks up the theme established by
3,14-16.
Rather than pursuing one’s own desires, it is by asking God that
one can receive gifts. Nevertheless, if one does not already live with
the wisdom that comes down from God (1,17; 3,17), one will probably
not turn to God to fulfil one’s needs. On the contrary, desire, a
characteristic feature of the world, might easily infect the religious
piety of community members so as to use their prayers to God for their
own gain: “You ask and do not receive, because you ask wrongly in
order to spend it on your desires†(4,3). In 4,4 James charges those
who pursue their own desires with his harshest invective: being
“adulteressesâ€.
In support of his argument stressing the need for a whole-hearted,
unreserved commitment to God, James next turns to Scripture. He
offers two quotations whose citation in 4,5 forms a thorny problem.
God is probably the implied subject of katw/vkisen (23) since he caused
the human spirit to reside within man (Gen 2,7; 6,17; 7,15; Ps 104,29-
30; etc). The phrase “the spirit which he made to dwell in us†then
(21) The term hJdonhv usually means simply “pleasureâ€, but it is also found in
the sense of “desire for pleasureâ€. The verb ejpiqumei'n in the next verse clearly
indicates the latter sense of hJdonhv here. It was the selfish, indulgent desire that
was responsible for strife and wars; cf. Titus 3,3 which shows hJdonhv and ejpiqumiva
to be almost synonymous. Further, see JOHNSON, The Letter of James, 276;
HARTIN, James, 196; R.W. WALL, Community of the Wise. The Letter of James
(The New Testament in Context; Valley Forge, PA 1997) 195; JACKSON-MCCABE,
Logos and Law, 202.
(22) See, with respect to Jas 1,14-15, JOHNSON, The Letter of James, 193-194.
Cf. also HARTIN, James, 196.
(23) See DAVIDS, The Epistle of James, 163.