Huub van de Sandt, «James 4,1-4 in the Light of the Jewish Two Ways
Tradition 3,1-6», Vol. 88 (2007) 38-63
The author of the Letter of James accuses his readers (Jas 4,1-4) of being responsible for war, murder and adultery. How are we to explain this charge? This paper shows that the material in Jas 1,13-21; 2,8-11 and 4,1-4 is closely akin to
the teknon section in Did 3,1-6. The teknon section belonged to the Jewish Two Ways tradition which, for the most part, is covered by the first six chapters of the
Didache. Interestingly, Did 3,1-6 exhibits close affinity with the ethical principles of a particular stream of Rabbinic tradition found in early Derekh Erets treatises. James 4,1-4 should be considered a further development of the warnings in Did 3,1-6.
James 4,1-4 in the Light of the Jewish Two Ways Tradition 3,1-6 49
In order to prove the relevance of the teknon section to the Letter
of James, our initial concern must be to establish connections. Let us
consider Jas 1,14-15 first. Three points may be noted at this stage.
First, in both James and the teknon section the vice ejpiqumiva is found.
Whereas the noun ejpiqumiva and the adjective ejpiqumhthv" in Did 3,3
describe specifically sexual passions, the context of the word ejpiqumiva
in James suggests a broader conception. It appears to highlight
individual responsibility for sin. In accordance with the teknon
passage, however, the term’s sexual connotation is developed in Jas
1,14-15 with vivid metaphors. “Desire†is personified as a seductive
female who, having actively enticed the person referenced in v. 14,
conceives a bastard child by him. Second, James describes the
consequence of desire in terms of giving birth: personified Desire
gives birth to (tivktei) sin, and sin brings forth (ajpokuvei) death (1,15).
The teknon section uses a similar “birthing†language in connection
with the major sins in the second part (the “d†clauses) of its
symmetrical strophes (35). Third, both in Jas 1,14-15 and in the teknon
section the concatenated form is found. Like Jas 1,14-15, the teknon
section encapsulates its teaching in a chain-saying structure carrying
the thought from step to step: “be not angry, for anger..†and “be not
desiring, for desire...â€.
These examples taken together constitute an argument. Yet
corroborative evidence is needed before we can be completely certain.
Let us focus our interest on Jas 1,19-21. I shall first assess the relation
between Jas 1,19d-20 and the teknon section, and then discuss v. 21
and its counterparts. I established above that the statements in Jas
1,19d-20 give some detailed information about the content of ejpiqumiva
mentioned in 1,14-15. Of particular interest is also that the statement
in 1,19d-20 is shaped in the form of a chain-saying: “(Let every man
be) slow to anger (ojrghvn), for the anger (ojrghv) of man does not work
the righteousness of Godâ€. The clauses might easily recall Did 3,2ab:
“Be not angry (mh; givnou ojrgivlo"), for anger (ojrghv) leads to murder
(fonon). One could admittedly argue that the phrase is too general to
v
carry much weight here as warnings against anger frequently occur in
(35) As seen above, however, James prefers the terms tivktw and ajpokuevw in
this context rather than the usual verb gennavw as employed in the teknon section.
He keeps restating his source in his own words and thus developed it as his own
teaching; KLOPPENBORG, “The Reception of the Jesus Traditionsâ€, 116-121. The
verb ajpokuevw (“to bear youngâ€) is also used in 1,18 but with respect to the
unusual female image for God as “the father of light†who gives birth.