Peter Dubovský, «Assyrian downfall through Isaiah’s eyes (2 Kings 15–23): the historiography of representation», Vol. 89 (2008) 1-16
In this article I compared Assyrian expansion as presented in the Bible with that presented in the Assyrian sources. Then I pointed out the problems of the historical events presented in the Bible. Combining these problems with the results of source-criticism I argued that the biblical 'distortion' of the historical events was intentional. The writers probably did it to offer their interpretation of the downfall of Assyria. This presentation and organization of the events can be explained in terms of the historiography of representation. By applying this concept it is possible to explain several textual and historical problems of these chapters.
12 Peter Dubovsk´
y
overwhelming military power and territorial expansion of Assyria.
Nevertheless, they differ in interpreting its causes and predicting its
future. Therefore the real challenge the ancient writers had to face was
not to present the generally accepted phenomena, but rather to offer a
comprehensive and hope-inspiring interpretation. Given the fact that
the final composition of 2 Kgs 18–19 took place after the exile (31),
another undeniable fact must have been taken into consideration —
this power did fall. Other biblical books also gave some thought to the
fall of Assyria (see Is 10,5-19; 14,24-27; 30,27-33; 31,4-5; Zeph 2,13;
Mic 5,5; Nah 2-3; Zec 10,11; Am 9,7). The number of passages in the
book of Isaiah indicates that the prophet Isaiah probably played a key
role in understanding the reasons for the collapse of the Assyrian
Empire (32). Therefore, the introduction of Isaiah’s prophecies (2 Kgs
19,6-7.20-34) in the midst of the biblical account 2 Kgs 15–23 can be
seen as a confirmation of the prophecy uttered probably in the time
when no one expected that this might could ever collapse.
V. Two versions, two contexts
That Isaiah’s interpretation is not only in 2 Kgs but also in the book
of Isaiah (Is 36–37) suggests that a plausible interpretation of Assyrian
expansion was a nagging question. Several scholars have already
investigated the role of Hezekiah’s story in the context of the book of
Isaiah (33). Using a unique expression, which occurs only in Is 7,3 and
(31) N. NA’AMAN, “Updating the Messages: Hezekiah’s Second Prophetic
Story (2 Kings 19.9b-35) and the Community of Babylonian Deporteesâ€, “Like a
Bird in a Cageâ€. The Invasion of Sennacherib in 701 BCE, (ed. L.L. GRABBE)
(London – New York, NY 2003) 201-220; S.W. HOLLOWAY, “Harran: Cultic
Geography in the Neo-Assyrian Empire and Its Implications for Sennacherib’s
‘Letter to Hezekiah’ in 2 Kingsâ€, The Pitcher Is Broken. Memorial Essays for
Gösta W. Ahlström (ed. L.K. HANDY) (Sheffield 1995) 276-314.
(32) R.E. CLEMENTS, Isaiah and the Deliverance of Jerusalem. A Study of the
Interpretation of Prophecy in the Old Testament (JSOTSS 13; Sheffield 1980)
28-71.
(33) P.R. ACKROYD, “Isaiah 36-39: Structure and Functionâ€, Von Kanaan bis
Kerala. Festschrift für Prof. Mag. Dr. Dr. J.P.M. Van der Ploeg O.P. zur
Vollendung des Siebzigsten Lebensjahres am 4. Juli 1979 (ed. J.P.M.D. PLOEG)
(Kevelaer – Neukirchen – Vluyn 1982) 3-21; K.A.D. SMELIK, “Distortion of Old
Testament Prophecy: The Purpose of Isaiah XXXVI and XXXVIIâ€, Crises and
Perspectives. Studies in Ancient near Eastern Polytheism, Biblical Theology,
Palestinian Archaeology and Intertestamental Literature (A. S. VAN DER WOUDE)
(Leiden 1986) 70-93.