Stephan Witetschek, «Artemis and Asiarchs. Some Remarks on Ephesian Local Colour in Acts 19», Vol. 90 (2009) 334-355
Luke’s account about Paul’s stay in Ephesos (Acts 19) is well known for its strong local colour, two elements of which are studied in this contribution: the asiarchs (19,31) and the title newko/roj (temple-warden) for Ephesos (19,35). The appearance of asiarchs in Acts questions the view that the asiarchs were the highpriests of the provincial imperial cult. Acts 19,35 contributes to the discussion about city-titles in the 1st-3rd centuries CE. In both instances, Acts is a source not so much for the narrated time of Paul, but rather for Luke’s own time, and as such of interest for both exegetes and historians.
342 Stephan Witetschek
508). The undated inscription IvE 638 refers to him as [to;n aj]siavrchn
kai; [gu]mnasivarcon [ka]i; pruvtanin kai; [ne]wkovron. In the heavily
damaged inscriptions IvE 425; 425A (not clearly datable) (24) he figures
presumably as tri;" ajrciereu;" th'" ΔAsiva" (25), and in IvE 424 (102-114
CE) (26); 5101; 5113 (after 110) (27) he is tri;" ajsiavrch" (in IvE 424 also
newkoro") (28).
v
Assuming that ajsiavrch" and ajrciereu;" th'" ΔAsiva" are two
distinct offices, one would have to postulate that Ti. Claudius Aristion
had some unattested terms of office both as asiarch and as high priest of
Asia in order to reach the total of three terms as asiarch by 110-114 and
three terms as high priest of Asia at an unspecified time — altogether
six terms of office in most prestigious positions. This would certainly
be an enormously strong indication for a consistently high social
standing and popularity as well as for the will and the ability to spend
large sums of money (29) for almost three decades, but it is not a priori
impossible. It certainly weakens this case that some terms of office are
not attested in the enormously rich epigraphic corpus of Ephesos and
have to be postulated. But it should be kept in mind that, although the
extant material is still impressive, many inscribed marble blocks were
later re-used as building material (and accordingly damaged or
destroyed) or ended up in medieval and early modern lime kilns.
Therefore there are always gaps in the epigraphic evidence.
On the other hand, assuming that ajsiavrch" and ajrciereu;" th'"
(24) Both marble-blocks have been re-used in other buildings, and the
inscriptions on them are heavily damaged.
(25) The iteration is deduced from a rho in a lacuna on the left of ajrc[i]ereva in
IvE 425,2, which is best restored to [t]r[iv"].
(26) This inscription on the Nymphaeum Traiani contains a dedication to the
Imperator Nerva Traianus Caesar Augustus Germanicus Dacicus. Trajan had
assumed the title “Dacicus†in autumn 102, and in August 114 he added the title
“Optimusâ€; cf. D. KIENAST, Römische Kaisertabelle. Grundzüge einer römischen
Kaiserchronologie (Darmstadt 21996) 123.
(27) Ti. Iulius Aquila, whom these two inscriptions mention as consul, was
consul suffectus in 110, see the commentary to IvE 5101.
(28) It should be pointed out that, in Greek city religion, priesthood was not
primarily a matter of vocation and life-long commitment, but rather analogous to
a public office which prominent citizens held for a certain period, often one year;
cf. e.g. F. PIRENNE-DELFORGE, “Personnel du culte: monde grec. II. Prêtres et
prêtressesâ€, Thesaurus Cultus et Rituum Antiquorum (eds. V. LAMBRINOUDAKIS –
J.C. BALTY) (Los Angeles, CA 2005) V, 3-31.
(29) The building inscription IvE 424 as well as the honorific inscription IvE
425 explicitly point out that Ti. Claudius Aristion erected “public†buildings with
his own money (ejk tw'n ijdivwn).