Luca Mazzinghi, «The Divine Violence in the Book of Qoheleth», Vol. 90 (2009) 545-558
In the face of violence, Qoheleth’s answer: “There is no one to console them” (Qoh 4,1) seems to be a hostile allusion aimed at God (cf. Isa 40,1) who is considered responsible for that violence. Yet Qoheleth’s God is not an abstract and remote deity; Qoheleth’s criticism is directed rather at the God of retribution (cf. Qoh 9,1-3). By stressing divine transcendence, Qoheleth considers that God is beyond all human comprehension (cf. 8,16-17). In Qoheleth one cannot speak of divine violence, but there is the problem of human language about God. Man can only “fear God” and accept the joy that God grants him as a gift in his fleeting life.
558 Luca Mazzinghi
Life appears to Qoheleth in all its pain and toil (lm[; ˆny[), in all its
inconsistency and even in its absurdity (lbh), but consists also in that
labour of seeking and exploring which God himself has given to
humanity (1,13; 3,10-11). In this laborious search, the human explorer
undoubtedly experiences the dark side of God but, at the same time,
discovers that God is the giver of life and joy, that in “fearing Godâ€,
“eating and drinkingâ€, the daily joys of life, can be rediscovered as
those signs of a presence which is certainly limited and mysterious but
nonetheless always real and not necessarily negative.
In conclusion, Qoheleth does not describe his God as an absent
divinity or as an unjust or even violent God. He is simply beyond all
possibility of comprehension: “the absurdity of evil is a demonstration
of man’s incapacity to decipher the will of God which is unfathomable
and inaccessible†(47). Certainly there exists in the book of Qoheleth an
unresolved tension between the experience of life, which leads
Qoheleth to reflect on the absurdity of violence, and faith in the biblical
God, who should be proclaimed as the comforter of this same violence.
What makes the book of Qoheleth still passionate today, and, in many
aspects, contemporary, is his having succeeded in maintaining a strong
position between the two extremes: on the one hand, the experience of
humanity itself, and, on the other, the fear of God, that is faith in the
One who allows human beings to lay claim to the little joys of daily
life, joys that are limited but real signs of his presence.
Via della Chiesa 123 Luca MAZZINGHI
50036 Bivigliano - Vaglia (FI)
SUMMARY
In the face of violence, Qoheleth’s answer: “There is no one to console themâ€
(Qoh 4,1) seems to be a hostile allusion aimed at God (cf. Isa 40,1) who is
considered responsible for that violence. Yet Qoheleth’s God is not an abstract
and remote deity; Qoheleth’s criticism is directed rather at the God of retribution
(cf. Qoh 9,1-3). By stressing divine transcendence, Qoheleth considers that God is
beyond all human comprehension (cf. 8,16-17). In Qoheleth one cannot speak of
divine violence, but there is the problem of human language about God. Man can
only “fear God†and accept the joy that God grants him as a gift in his fleeting life.
Adamâ€: cf. H. SIMIAN-YOFRE, “Conoscere la sapienza. Qohelet e Gen 2-3â€,
BELLA-PASSARO (eds.), Il libro del Qohelet, 335.
(47) D’ALARIO, “L’assurdità del maleâ€, 197.