Gerald Klingbeil - Chantal J. Klingbeil, «‘Eyes to Hear’: Nehemiah 1,6 from a Pragmatics and Ritual Theory Perspective», Vol. 91 (2010) 91-102
This study of the enigmatic phrase K1d:@b;(a tla@pit@-l)e (amo#$li tw$xw%tup; K1yney('w: “and your eyes open to listen to the prayer of your servant” (Neh 1,6) utilizes an interdisciplinary approach involving insights from linguistic pragmatics and ritual theory. We will begin with a brief review of the history of interpretation of this phrase. Particular attention will then be given to elements of ritual theory, such as trigger point, ritual language, time, place, sequence, etc. Finally, we will examine the pragmatic context, discourse, and conversational strategies involved with this phrase.
100 GERALD A. KLINGBEIL – CHANTAL J. KLINGBEIL
and that a similar course of action needs to be undertaken. In recent North
American politics a statement that “Iraq is another Vietnam†would evoke
many responses. Most Americans would immediately understand the
speaker to be saying that US involvement in the Iraq war is the same as or
similar to the US experience in the Vietnam war.
Nehemiah could well be attempting to evoke such a memory trigger by
his use of the “eyes to hear†phrase. First of all, he would be trying to
evoke it in his communication with God whom he is addressing and,
secondarily, his audience of later potential readers. The specific context is
one of destruction and desolation — at least this is how Nehemiah perceives
the situation in Jerusalem to be from the reports that he has just received.
Even though there are no clear semantic links, it seems that for Nehemiah
the context is similar to the one described in Gen 1,2, perhaps as “without
form and void†as the earth was. This is an event that Nehemiah is sure
God remembers, God saw the void, God acted and creation took place.
After each creation day God saw everything and it was good 36. Nehemiah is
asking God to see the situation now, see that it is not good but rather similar
to the Whb: Wht “ without form and being void (i.e., chaotic)†before
ow o
creation. He is asking God to reassert his creative power within the current
context.
For a Jewish reader this contextual association would not seem
stretched. All history began for the Jewish reader with the creation account
of God bringing order from chaos. The formation of the Jewish nation itself
was seen as a divine creative act by God. The becoming of a nation in
Exod 1, the plague narrative in Exod 7–12, as well as the “creation†of the
sanctuary (Exod 25–40) are all couched in creation language 37. The reader
is now also invited to see how God will act. By means of the “eyes to hearâ€
phrase, the reader has been sensitized to the “seeing motif†that appears
repeatedly in the next two chapters. The action that follows in the narrative
can quickly be seen. For, after asking God to see, Nehemiah’s prayer is
See Gen 1,4.10.12.18.21.25.31. The divine act of seeing and considering it
36
good is closely linked to his creative power. As stated by C. WESTERMANN,
Genesis (Minneapolis, MN 1994) III, 113, “such recognition (i.e., seeing)
belongs to the very process of creationâ€.
Compare here W.H. SCHMIDT, “Eine Querverbindung — jahwistische
37
Urgeschichte und Plagenerzählungenâ€, Auf dem Weg zur Endgestalt von
G e n e s i s bis II Regum (FS Hans-Christoph Schmitt) (eds. M. BECK –
U. SCHORN) (BZAW 370; Berlin 2006) 35-40; B. JANOWSKI, “Der Himmel auf
Erden. Zur kosmologischen Bedeutung des Tempels in der Umwelt Israelsâ€,
Das biblische Weltbild und seine altorientalischen Kontexte (eds. B. JANOWSKI
– B. EGO ; FAT 32; Tübingen 2001) 229-260, and earlier B. JANOWSKI,
“ Tempel und Schöpfungâ€, JBTh 5 (1990) 37-69.