Philipp F. Bartholomä, «John 5,31-47 and the Teaching of Jesus in the Synoptics. A Comparative Approach.»
Within Johannine scholarship, the assumed differences between Jesus’ teaching in John and in the Synoptics have frequently led to a negative judgment about Johannine authenticity. This article proposes a comparative approach that distinguishes between different levels of similarity in wording and content and applies it to John 5,31-47. What we find in this discourse section corresponds conceptually to a significant degree with the picture offered in the Synoptics, though couched in a very different idiom. Thus, the comparative evidence does not preclude us from accepting this particular part of Johannine speech material as an authentic representation of the actual content of Jesus’words.
		Biblica_1:Layout 1   21-11-2011    12:59    Pagina 385
                                                                                     385
                     JOHN 5,31-47 AND THE TEACHING OF JESUS IN THE SYNOPTICS
                In John 5,41 Jesus explains that he does “not accept glory from
            human beingsâ€. In the context of this discourse Jesus is saying that
            he is not depending on human praise and testimony 26. No direct
            parallel from Jesus to this statement can be found in the Synoptics.
            In Luke 4,24 par. [0/1-level of closeness], however, Jesus actually
            has to live without the praise and acceptance of people (and ap-
            parently was in a position to do so).
                Due to his intimate knowledge of his hearers, Jesus is then able to
            address them in John 5,42 with another charge: “you do not have the
            love of God in you [thn avga,phn tou/ qeou/]â€, i.e., they are not a people
                                     .
            who love God. This, again, is no Johannine idiosyncrasy since in the
            Synoptics Jesus utters the exact same accusation in his woes against
            the Pharisees and their religious practices. For example, in Luke 11,42
            he states: “you (…) neglect justice and the love of God [thn avga,phn
                                                                            .
            tou/ qeou/]†[1/2-level of closeness] 27. More generally, one might add
            that Mark 12,30 par. confirms that dedication to and love for God are
            certainly core concerns of Jesus’ preaching: “you shall love
            [agaphseij] the Lord your God [ton qeo,n] with all your heart (…)â€
              v     ,                              .
            [thus a possible 1/1-level of closeness] 28.
                John 5,43a and 5,43b reiterates that Jesus is not on a self-ap-
            pointed mission but is authorized by the Father and thus subordi-
            nate to him: “I have come in my Father’s nameâ€, yet, “you do not
            accept meâ€. That the Father stands behind the ministry of Jesus is
            expressed in different terms in Matt 11,27 par. (cf. Matt 21,9 par.),
            with Jesus maintaining that “all things have been handed over to
            me by my Father†[1/1-level of closeness; cf. the common usage
            of tou/ patro,j mou], as well as in his announcement in Matt 23,39
            par. that a time is coming when people will acknowledge him “who
            comes in the name of the Lord†[1/1-level of closeness]. A lack of
            acceptance of Jesus and his mission is likewise part of synoptic
            speech material, as in Matt 17,17 par., where Jesus calls his Jewish
            audience an “unbelieving generation†[0/1-level of closeness].
                In 5,43c Jesus goes on to say that rather than accepting the
            God-sent Messiah, “if another comes in his own name, you will
            accept himâ€. The prediction of false, self-proclaimed prophets
               26
                  KEENER, John, I, 660.
               27
                  Luke 11,42 is listed as a Johannine parallel in the 27NA margin.
               28
                  BLOMBERG, Historical Reliability, 117.