Philipp F. Bartholomä, «John 5,31-47 and the Teaching of Jesus in the Synoptics. A Comparative Approach.»
Within Johannine scholarship, the assumed differences between Jesus’ teaching in John and in the Synoptics have frequently led to a negative judgment about Johannine authenticity. This article proposes a comparative approach that distinguishes between different levels of similarity in wording and content and applies it to John 5,31-47. What we find in this discourse section corresponds conceptually to a significant degree with the picture offered in the Synoptics, though couched in a very different idiom. Thus, the comparative evidence does not preclude us from accepting this particular part of Johannine speech material as an authentic representation of the actual content of Jesus’words.
Biblica_1:Layout 1 21-11-2011 12:59 Pagina 384
384 PHILIPP F. BARTHOLOMÄ
word in Matt 5,17 as a parallel to John 5,39 22. Yet, even closer par-
allels are observable in Luke 24,44 (“everything written about me
in the law of Moses, the prophets, and the psalms must be ful-
filledâ€) 23 and also in Luke 18,31 (“everything that is written about
the Son of Man by the prophetsâ€) 24.
While the Jewish crowd was willing to listen to John the Baptist
for a while (5,35), Jesus declares in John 5,40 that they are not willing
to come to him and accept him: “you refuse to come to me to have
lifeâ€. The motif of the unwillingness of the Jews to come to Jesus is
present in the Synoptics as well, as Jesus laments concerning
Jerusalem in Matt 23,37 par.: “How often have I desired to gather
your children together as a hen gathers her brood under her wings,
and you were not willing†[1/2-level of closeness; cf. negated form
of qe,lw]. “There is [here in Matthew] the same thought of a tender ea-
gerness to save, met by a stubborn refusal to be saved†25. In two syn-
optic parables, Jesus addresses the exact same issue. In the so-called
parable of the prodigal son, the elder brother is unwilling to partici-
pate in the feast of the Father (Luke 15,28): “Then he became angry
and refused to go in†[1/2-level of closeness]. The same deliberate re-
fusal is visible in the parable of the great banquet in Matt 22,2-14
par., where those invited “would not come†to the wedding banquet.
If we take into account that the Johannine Jesus actually implies that
coming to him results in the receiving of “lifeâ€, several additional
synoptic parallels apply. In Matt 11,28 the Synoptic Jesus says “Come
to me (…) and I will give you rest†[note the common usage of the
phrase pro,j me], while the idea that the enjoyment of (eternal) life
[zwh] as linked to the person of Jesus is also present in Matt 19,29 par.
,
Finally, to acknowledge the Jewish refusal to come to Jesus in order
to have life could well be interpreted as a confirmation of Jesus’
assessment in Matt 7,14 that “the road is hard that leads to life, and
there are few who find itâ€.
22
BLOMBERG, Historical Reliability, 117.
23
For this parallel cf. also D. L. BOCK, Luke 9:51–24:53 (BECNT; Grand
Rapids, MI 1996) 1936.
24
For this parallel cf. also 27NA; A. J. KÖSTENBERGER, John (BECNT;
Grand Rapids, MI 2004) 193; CARSON, John, 264.
25
MORRIS, John, 293. This parallel is also mentioned by 27NA, as well as
BLOMBERG, Historical Reliability, 117; BROWN, John (i-xii), 225.