Koog P. Hong, «The Deceptive Pen of Scribes: Judean Reworking of the Bethel Tradition as a Program for Assuming Israelite Identity.», Vol. 92 (2011) 427-441
Nadav Na’aman has recently proposed that the Judean appropriation of Israel’s identity occurred as a result of the struggle for the patrimony of ancient Israel. This paper locates textual evidence for such a struggle in the Judean reworking of the Jacob tradition, particularly the Bethel account (Gen 28,10- 22), and argues that taking over the northern Israelite shrine myth after the fall of northern Israel was part of the ongoing Judean reconceptualization of their identity as «Israel» that continued to be developed afterwards.
Biblica_2:Layout 1 21-11-2011 13:02 Pagina 427
The Deceptive Pen of Scribes: Judean Reworking of the
Bethel Tradition as a Program for Assuming Israelite Identity
As P. R. Davies asks, “Why did Judeans call themselves ‘Israel’?†1
Among biblical scholars, there has been much discussion around this
intriguing question 2. Insofar as “Israel†was for centuries associated with
the Northern Kingdom, with which Judah had fluctuating political rela-
tions, Judah’s calling themselves “Israel†is not necessarily a matter of
course. In a recently published article in this journal, N. Na’aman proposes
a fresh argument. “The adaptation of the Israelite identity by the Judahite
scribes and elite was motivated by the desire to take over the highly pres-
tigious vacant heritage of the Northern Kingdomâ€, he claims, “just as As-
syria had sought to take possession of the highly prestigious heritage of
ancient Mesopotamia†3.
The significance of Na’aman’s proposal must be understood in the con-
text of other solutions to the problem of accounting for Judah’s assumption
of Israelite identity. The first alternative solution is the now popular notion
of the alleged migration of northern refugees in the wake of the Assyrian
crisis, refugees who supposedly brought their endangered traditions to the
south. It has been assumed that the pan-Israelite identity arose as a result of
Judean officials’ attempts to control the amalgamated population that re-
sulted from the alleged migration 4. Though attractive in many regards, this
first solution is undermined by the lack of evidence on the migration and is
1
P.R. DAVIES, The Origins of Biblical Israel (LHBOTS 485; New York
2007) 1.
2
See P.R. DAVIES, In Search of “Ancient Israel†(JSOTSup 148; Sheffield
1992) for the groundbreaking work on this issue. For a history of research,
see idem, Origins, 5-24.
3
N. NA’AMAN, “The Israelite-Judahite Struggle for the Patrimony of
Ancient Israelâ€, Bib 91 (2010) 17.
4
E.g., I. FINKELSTEIN – N.A. SILBERMAN, “Temple and Dynasty: Hezekiah,
the Remaking of Judah and the Rise of the Pan-Israelite Ideologyâ€, JSOT 30
(2006) 259-285; ID., The Bible Unearthed. Archaeology’s New Vision of Ancient
Israel and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts (New York 2001); and ID., David and
Solomon: In Search of the Bible’s Sacred Kings and the Roots of the Western
Tradition (New York 2006). For a notable variation, though not explicitly based
on the immigration of the refugees, see R.G. KRATZ, The Composition of the
Narrative Books of the Old Testament (London 2005) 181-182, 209, 218-219,
304-306, 309-319; ID., “Israel als Staat und als Volkâ€, ZTK 97 (2000) 1-17; ID.,
“Israel in the Book of Isaiahâ€, JSOT 31 (2006) 103-128.