John Makujina, «The Interpretation of Ps 144,14: Applying a Pluralistic Approach to a Manifold Difficulty», Vol. 92 (2011) 481-502
The interpretation of Ps 144,14 remains unsettled, due primarily to the difficulty of identifying an overall context for the colon. Of the two major positions dominating the debate, one contends that the topic of the entire verse is bovine fecundity, whereas the other considers part of the colon (v. 14b-c) to be about national security. The author finds both views to be problematic and proposes another solution, which retains attractive elements from each position: Ps 144,14 promises the prosperity of livestock, by assuring that they will not become the spoils of war.
Biblica_1_Layout 1 20/01/12 11:44 Pagina 499
499
THE INTERPRETATION OF PS 144,14
In favor of a drought is the description of unproductive fig trees,
grapeless vines, and a failing olive crop. The wording is also similar
to that of the drought in Jer 8,13: hnatb ~ynat !yaw !pgb ~ybn[ !ya 69.
Favoring the effects of an invasion is the location of this verse
immediately following the Babylonian invasion recorded in v. 16 70.
Much like Hab 3,17, the positioning of Isa 37,30 after the oracle
against Sennacherib (37,22-29) is contextually sufficient to indicate
that the gradual agricultural recovery described in 37,30 is a conse-
quence of the Assyrian destruction that preceded it 71. Moreover, the
martial interpretation is in cadence with Habakkuk’s earlier indict-
ment of the Babylonians for denuding Lebanon of its trees and an-
imals (2,17). Finally, Jeremiah’s prophecy (5,15-17) that future
invaders (Babylon?) will devour the harvest (including figs and
vines) and livestock, also upholds this reading of Hab 3,17.
If Hab 3,17 does, indeed, describe the results of a Babylonian
takeover, it furnishes supporting evidence for our proposal by also
combining martial and pastoral themes. It laments the horrors of
invasion and captivity through agricultural imagery, just as Ps
144,14 celebrates the security of the herd via martial imagery.
2. Potential Objections to the Pastoral-Martial Orientation
The only drawbacks to this formulation involve the semantic un-
certainties surrounding ~ylbsm and wnypwla; but these complications
are neither unique to this proposal nor insuperable. With respect to
~ylbsm, I recommend Held’s suggestion of “well cared forâ€, since it
is supported by its Aramaic counterpart, lbs (D-stem: “supportâ€,
“sustainâ€, “provide forâ€) 72, and does not require the insertion of ad-
69
HOLLADAY, Jeremiah 1 (Philadelphia, PA) 429.
70
The devastation of agriculture by invading armies is verified by the
Bible and ANE literature (e.g., Lev 26,16; Deut 28,33.49-51; Isa 1,7; Mic
4,4?). The measures include confiscating crops and cutting down fruit trees
for siege equipment (Deut 6,11; 20,19-20). COS 2.2A:12, 13.
71
Isa 37,22-30 = 2 Kgs 19,21-29.
72
HELD, “The Root Zbl/Sblâ€, 92, n. 49; BOOIJ, “Psalm 144â€, 174, 177-
178; DNWSI 774-775; H.G.M. WILLIAMSON, Ezra, Nehemiah (WBC 16;
Waco, TX 1985) 71; HALOT 1936; KIRKPATRICK, Psalms, 812. Elsewhere,
lklky, “sustainâ€, is used for the maintenance of the flock (Zech 11,16).