Juan Carlos Ossandón, «Bartimaeus’ Faith: Plot and Point of View in Mark 10,46-52», Vol. 93 (2012) 377-402
This analysis of the plot and the narrative point of view in Mark 10,46-52 sheds some light on the function of this episode in relation to the characterization of Jesus and of the disciples in Mark. Bartimaeus appears as a model of both confessing Jesus as Messiah and following him on the way to the cross. The narrator describes in detail Bartimaeus’ behavior, but it is Jesus who approves of it and implicitly accepts the blind man’s actions and words as a correct manifestation of faith in him.
04_Biblica_1_A_Ossandon_Layout 1 05/11/12 12:18 Pagina 400
400 JUAN CARLOS OSSANDÓN
veal his approval of Jesus’ words, although, as said above, from the
beginning of the Gospel he puts himself in Jesus’ position.
The petition of the blind man reveals his ideological point of view.
Although he asks for a miracle, he addresses Jesus not as a thau-
maturge, but as someone with authority to teach 62. Bartimaeus ac-
cepts Jesus’ dignity, shown by the fact of calling him instead of going
towards him. In the light of 10,52c, he considers himself as a disciple.
Concerning the narrator, his ideological point of view remains
unseen. He shows neither approval nor refusal; he just reproduces
Bartimaeus’ words.
g) 10,52
The words of Jesus in 10,52a constitute the peak of the dramatic
action. He accepts Bartimaeus’ petition, interprets his behavior, and
ensures his salvation. At the same time, Jesus implicitly accepts the
characterization made by Bartimaeus, that is, he recognizes as his
own the attributes of a merciful, Davidic Messiah, equipped with
the authority of a master, and able to restore sight. Defining Barti-
maeus, Jesus indirectly defines himself.
The fact that Jesus performs a crucial role in the episode reflects
well the normative role of his point of view in Mark. Before 10,52,
some gestures had conveyed the singular authority of Jesus, such
as stopping and making others call the blind man, an order that is
immediately obeyed.
What does the narrator think with respect to the point of view
of Jesus? The answer comes in the next two sentences. But now we
can note how the narrator has described skillfully every gesture and
word of Bartimaeus not employing the semantic field of faith, be-
cause he wanted Jesus to pronounce this word. He has also avoided
evaluating Bartimaeus and the other characters, because he was
waiting for Jesus’ judgment.
Once the dialogue is over, the narrator’s voice reappears. He
hurries to state that Bartimaeus’ desire has been accomplished, a
fact that curiously was absent from Jesus’ words, though implicit
in the idea of salvation. The narrator employs the same term used
by the blind man in his petition, in order to emphasize that it has
been exactly satisfied. The meaning of Bartimaeus’ following Jesus
62
DELORME, “Guérisonâ€, 12.