Hans Ausloos - Valérie Kabergs, «Paronomasia or Wordplay? A Babel-Like Confusion. Towards a Definition of Hebrew Wordplay», Vol. 93 (2012) 1-20
Against the general background of a terminological confusion that is present in contributions about Hebrew wordplay, the definition of the socalled paronomasia in relation to the term wordplay is especially debated. This article aims to clarify the concept of wordplay in the Hebrew Bible. After a survey of the current opinions in defining the terms «paronomasia» and «wordplay» (I), we propose our own definition of «Hebrew wordplay» (II). Thereafter, this description will simultaneously delimit the field of Hebrew wordplay as it excludes a few linguistic figures, although they are possibly classified as wordplay in other studies (III).
17
PARONOMASIA OR WORDPLAY?
literally. Thus, it seems to be some kind of metaphorical speech rather
than wordplay. (4) The several instances of what one calls visual
wordplay/paronomasia should be mentioned here too 46. As already
stated, these figures are exclusively dependent on the written word to
create ambiguity 47. One can differentiate between the gematria, at-
bash, not(e)rikon and the alphabetic acrosticon in this context 48.
– According to the principle of a gematria, each Hebrew conso-
nant is related to a certain number. Numbers can therefore be sym-
bolically interpreted as referring to words or proper nouns. Some
have, for example, seen a gematria in Numbers 1,46 and more specif-
ically in the number 603,550, the number of people delivered from
Egypt 49. 603,550 would be a gematria for bene yisra’el kol ros, “the
children of Israel, every individualâ€. Words can also bear a sort of
hidden meaning that can only be “deciphered†when one relates the
consonants to their equivalent numbers 50. For example, some schol-
ars consider the proper noun Gad to be a gematria for the number
seven 51. Attributing the seventh place to Gad in the list of tribes in
Genesis 46 and Gad becoming the father of seven sons would there-
fore not be a coincidence.
– The atbash is based on the idea that the last character of the al-
phabet is replaced with the first character, the second to last char-
acter is replaced by the second character, and so on 52. Cherry
46
Cf. SASSON, Wordplay in the Old Testament, 968-969; BEITZEL, Exodus
3:14 and the Divine Name, 6-8; CHERRY, Paronomasia and Proper Names in
the Old Testament, 18-20.
47
Cf. CHERRY, Paronomasia and Proper Names in the Old Testament, 18.
48
Cf. BEITZEL, Exodus 3:14 and the Divine Name, 6-7; SASSON, Wordplay
in the Old Testament, 969; CHERRY, Paronomasia and Proper Names in the
Old Testament, 18-19.
49
BEITZEL, Exodus 3:14 and the Divine Name, 6-7.
50
However, Beitzel, Sasson and Cherry agree that the “decoding†of such
gematria is often the result of subjective interpretations of Bible interpreters
rather than the intention of the Hebrew author/redactor.
51
SASSON, Wordplay in the Old Testament, 969.
52
For more information regarding this subject, see M. LEUCHTER, “Jere-
miah’s 70-Year Prophecy and the ymq bl/K## Atbash Codesâ€, Bib 85
(2004) 503-522; S.B. NOEGEL, “Atbash in Jeremiah and Its Literary Signifi-
cance: Part 1â€, JBQ 24 (1996) 82-89; “Part 2â€, JBQ 24 (1996) 160-166; “Part
3â€, JBQ 24 (1996) 247-250; R.C. STEINER, “The Two Sons of Neriah and the
Two Editions of Jeremiah in Light of the Two Atbash Code-Words for Ba-
bylonâ€, VT 46 (1996) 83-84.