Paul Foster, «Is Q a 'Jewish Christian' Document?», Vol. 94 (2013) 368-394
Recent research has generated different hypotheses concerning the social location of Q. This discussion commences with an examination of scholarship on the phenomenon of 'Jewish Christianity' and theories concerning the social location of Q. Next, meta-level questions are addressed, concerning how social location is determined from a text. The discussion then considers four areas mentioned in Q that might be of potential significance for determining social location. These are references to synagogues, the law, Gentiles, and unbelieving Israel. In conclusion, the inclusive perspectives may suggest that the document had a more positive attitude toward Gentiles than is often stated.
03_Biblica_Foster_Layout 1 08/07/13 12:56 Pagina 387
387
IS Q A “JEWISH CHRISTIAN†DOCUMENT?
a similar response “in Israel†(Q 7.9). Although the centurion is not
explicitly described as a Gentile, the contrast with “Israel†implicitly
but clearly evokes this understanding, and attempts to avoid casting
the centurion as a Gentile simply miss the key intention of the story 60.
The antipathy of Q towards a form of belief that is based on the plaintive
confession of Jesus as κύÏιος without corresponding action is well
known (Q 6.46) 61. Whether the centurion actually addressed Jesus as
“Lord†in the Q version of this tradition is a complex and hotly debated
question 62. While this is perhaps best explained as a Matthean addition,
the decision is perhaps irrelevant in relation to the more central question
of the overall meaning of this pericope. The faith of the centurion is
what leads to Jesus granting his request. In relation to the Matthean
form of this story, Davies and Allison summarize its core message in
the following manner: “Faith conquers the separation between Jew and
Gentile; it cannot but gain Jesus’ kindly help†63. There is no reason to
understand the central message of this story as being any different in Q
than it is in Matthew.
The attitude toward Gentiles in Q does not receive systematic
treatment. The two brief references represent different trajectories.
In Q 6.34, Gentiles are mentioned stereotypically (as are tax-collec-
tors) as those who do not practice the type of group ethic that is pre-
sented as a key feature of Jesus’ teaching. This negative portrayal
of Gentile behaviour is not employed to exclude Gentiles, or to place
them beyond the reach of the teaching of Q, but to illustrate the dif-
ference between the love-ethic that is being promoted and the usual
ethical practices that were understood to prevail in Gentile society.
By contrast, the concrete example of the centurion implicitly con-
trasts the faith of this individual with the majority response from Is-
The possibility that the centurion is not a Gentile is supported by D.R.
60
CATCHPOLE, “The Centurion’s Faithâ€, The Four Gospels 1992. Festschrift
Frans Neirynck (eds. F. VAN SEDBROECK – C.M. TUCKETT – G. VAN BELLE –
J. VERHEYDEN) (BETL 100; Leuven 1992) III, 539-540.
P. FOSTER, “The Pastoral Purpose of Q’s Two-Stage Son of Man Christo-
61
logyâ€, Bib 89 (2008) 81-91, esp. 82.
S.R. JOHNSON (ed.), Documenta Q. Q 7:1-10, The Centurion’s Faith in
62
Jesus’ Word (Leuven – Paris – Sterling, VA 2002) 163-166.
W.D. DAVIES – D.C. Allison, The Gospel According to Saint Matthew
63
(ICC; Edinburgh 1991) II, 25.
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2013 - Tutti i diritti riservati