Paul Foster, «Is Q a 'Jewish Christian' Document?», Vol. 94 (2013) 368-394
Recent research has generated different hypotheses concerning the social location of Q. This discussion commences with an examination of scholarship on the phenomenon of 'Jewish Christianity' and theories concerning the social location of Q. Next, meta-level questions are addressed, concerning how social location is determined from a text. The discussion then considers four areas mentioned in Q that might be of potential significance for determining social location. These are references to synagogues, the law, Gentiles, and unbelieving Israel. In conclusion, the inclusive perspectives may suggest that the document had a more positive attitude toward Gentiles than is often stated.
03_Biblica_Foster_Layout 1 08/07/13 12:56 Pagina 388 03_B
388 PAUL FOSTER
rael. Indeed, the fact that a Gentile soldier is commended and con-
trasted with corporate Israel illustrates that for Q, believers in Jesus
are known by their faith and not by their ethnic origin.
4. Unbelieving Israel
The story of the centurion’s servant has already raised the cate-
gorization of Israel as unbelieving when contrasted with the faith
exhibited by the centurion. The portrayal of unbelieving Israel is
also prominent in Q 10.12-15; 11.30-32; 13.29, 28. In Q 10.13 the
woes against Chorazin and Bethsaida do not necessarily show a
positive attitude toward the Gentile cities of Tyre and Sidon; instead
these are use hyperbolically to illustrate the degree of unbelief that
is being exhibited by Jewish cities in the face of the wonders that
are being performed by Jesus. Similarly, with the discussion con-
cerning the sign of Jonah (Q 11.30-32), historic Gentiles, the
Ninevites and the Queen of the South, are presented as being more
responsive than contemporary Jewish hearers of Jesus’ message.
Perhaps most positively, the in-gathering of the multitudes from
the east and the west (Q 13.29) speaks of inclusion of the Gentiles
at the eschatological banquet, whereas the plural “you†to whom
the warning is addressed are told that they “will be cast out into the
place of weeping and gnashing of teeth†(Q 13.28).
Such a critique of “unbelieving Israelâ€, however, fails to reveal
the social location of the Q community. It is possible to envisage
competing scenarios whereby the original audience of Q could ei-
ther be seeking to reform and convince non-believing Jewish con-
temporaries from within Judaism, or more critically castigating
such opponents after having been excluded or having departed from
synagogue society.
This lack of transparency concerning the social situation is a prod-
uct of a number of factors. First, Q is seeking to transmit traditions
about Jesus rather than to overtly recount the contemporary socio-
religious situation in which the document was written. Secondly,
even with the most strident of these three sayings (Q 13.29, 28) the
precise identity of the adversaries is veiled by the use of the ambigu-
ous description of them as “the sons of the kingdomâ€. Obviously the
contrast with those coming from “the east and the west†naturally
evokes an implied comparison between Gentiles who will share the
eschatological banquet and those who consider themselves to be
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2013 - Tutti i diritti riservati