A.L.H.M. van Wieringen, «Psalm 65 as Non-Appropriation Theology», Vol. 95 (2014) 179-197
The biblical perspective that a receiver of God's promises is not allowed to claim these promises is called non-appropriation theology. Psalm 65 can be read as an example of this non-appropriation theology. The 'I'- character does not claim the fertile Land but can only speak about the abundance of the harvest of their wheat (v. 10). The heading of Psalm 65, identifying the 'I'-character as David, preserves the non-appropriation theology. This non-appropriation theology is retained in the receptionhistory of Psalm 65, as can be found in the Septuagint and the liturgical use of Psalm 65 in the funeral Mass.
02_VanWieringen_179_197 15/07/14 12:15 Pagina 193
PSALM 65 193
In the conceptual world of the ancient Near East, a temple is al-
ways connected to life-giving water 25. Within the Psalter, this stand-
ard idiom is most explicitly present in Psalm 46: “our God is like
a firm stronghold in Jerusalem, in which a river gladdens the city”
(v. 4). When, in the Book of Ezekiel, the new temple is constructed
in chapters 40–42, and the altar is consecrated and the priests and
Levites are able to perform their liturgical tasks once again, in chap-
ter 47, a stream of water flows out of the sanctuary, which revives
the entire region, even the once barren Arabah, with water for trees
which will ensure a rich harvest every month 26.
This combination of temple and water can be found in Psalm 65
as well. The “courts”, the “house” and the “temple” are used as de-
sirable locations in verse 5, whereas the ‘water’ is present in the
“canal of God”, the temple river, in verse 10.
Elsewhere in the prophetic literature, the end of the exile is de-
scribed by using words which occur in Psalm 65 as well. The image
of the “sprout” (v. 11) is used in Isa 4,2 to indicate the remnant of
Israel. In Isa 61,11, the word “sprout” is used again to describe
God’s liberating activity of redemption from the exile: just as the
sprout is brought forth by the earth, so does God redeem.
The verb “to drip” (verses 12-13) occurs in prophecies as well
as in descriptions of the end of the exile. In Isa 45,8 a shower from
the heavens, God’s abode, is combined with words denoting vege-
tation: the earth will bear the fruit of salvation and righteousness
will sprout.
What communication arises in Psalm 65(64) from this prophetic
perspective in the Vulgate? The “I”-character becomes a prophetic
“I”-character, in which Jeremiah and Ezekiel, the prophets men-
tioned in the heading, converge. The “I”-character experiences the
exile, both the beginning and the end, and, therefore, has gone
through it in its entirety. As a consequence, the “we” that arises
consists of the people of God and its prophets.
Against this background, the expression “our transgressions” in
verse 4 refers to the wicked behaviour which caused the decline
and destruction of Jerusalem and its temple and, consequently, the
deportation into exile. The nations in verse 8 refer to the foreign
25 Cf. KEEL, Bildsymbolik, 122.
26 Cf. also Revelation 21–22.