Troy D. Cudworth, «The Division of Israel’s Kingdom in Chronicles: A Re-examination of the Usual Suspects.», Vol. 95 (2014) 498-523
The Chronicler constantly adapts the story of Israel’s kingship from the narrative in Samuel-Kings to show his great interest in the temple. With regard to the division of the united kingdom, recent scholarship has correctly shown how he has removed all the blame from Solomon due to his successful construction of the temple, but it has not come to any firm conclusion on whom the Chronicler does find guilty. This article contends that the Chronicler blames Rehoboam for ignoring the plea of «all Israel», an essential facet of the nation’s temple worship.
002_cudworth_co_498_523 13/02/15 11:26 Pagina 513
THE DIVISION OF ISRAEL’S KINGDOM IN CHRONICLES 513
sert the two important facts that (1) Solomon did not subject Is-
raelites to slavery and (2) he did not promote non-Israelites to lead-
ership. On the other hand, these verses do not say anything about
the majority of Israelites that fell in between these two ranks. Pre-
sumably, the Chronicler would still have the reader assume that this
larger group performed very difficult work, even if it was not as
bad as the forced labor to which Solomon subjected the resident
aliens. He perhaps mentions one such servant (db[) in the speech
of Abijah, Jeroboam (cf. 2 Chr 13,6) 46.
The plea of all Israel in 2 Chronicles 10 can be compatible with
such an interpretation of 8,7-10. The people say in v. 4, “Your father
made our yoke heavy. Now therefore, lighten the hard service
(hdb[) of your father and the heavy yoke that he placed on us, and
we will serve (db[, qal) you”. Nothing in this verse resembles the
slavery that appeared in 2 Chr 8,9, but describes the work that the
people were willing to do. Klein assumes that the text uses the word
for “yoke” (l[) in 10,4 with the familiar agricultural and oppressive
sense metaphorically to refer to forced labor on state projects, but
it makes little sense to assume a definition that already contradicts
the passage in 8,7-10 (see the use of “forced labor” [sm] in 8,8) 47.
They did not complain that they indeed had work/service (hdb[)
at all, but that it had grown to be too strenuous. Their offer to serve
(db[, qal) at the end of the verse, together with the counsel of the
elders in v. 7 (“If you will be good to this people […] they will be
your servants [~ydb[] forever.”), further demonstrates their will-
ingness to engage in work as long as the king would simply treat
them well. Hence, the statements in 8,9 and 10,4 do make sense to-
gether in the Chronicler’s narrative, just as they did in 1 Kings.
Yet the question may still remain: even if Solomon did not sub-
ject the Israelites to slavery as the text says in 8,9, does the Chron-
icler ever allude to any heavy work that would have caused all
Israel to plead with Rehoboam as they do in 2 Chr 10,4? As noted
above, the Chronicler focuses the entirety of Solomon’s reign on
his construction of the temple. Even so, he still has given some at-
46
The fact that the Chronicler inserts this note about Solomon’s servant
Jeroboam alerts any interpreter to the wide semantic range of the noun.
47
KLEIN, 2 Chronicles, 158. Along these same lines, see also E.L. CURTIS
– A.A. MADSEN, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Books of
Chronicles (ICC; Edinburgh 1910) 363.