Troy D. Cudworth, «The Division of Israel’s Kingdom in Chronicles: A Re-examination of the Usual Suspects.», Vol. 95 (2014) 498-523
The Chronicler constantly adapts the story of Israel’s kingship from the narrative in Samuel-Kings to show his great interest in the temple. With regard to the division of the united kingdom, recent scholarship has correctly shown how he has removed all the blame from Solomon due to his successful construction of the temple, but it has not come to any firm conclusion on whom the Chronicler does find guilty. This article contends that the Chronicler blames Rehoboam for ignoring the plea of «all Israel», an essential facet of the nation’s temple worship.
002_cudworth_498_523 24/02/15 11:48 Pagina 503
THE DIVISION OF ISRAEL’S KINGDOM IN CHRONICLES 503
The following so-called ark narrative tells how David sought to
gather still more Israelites (i.e. an even more robust “all Israel”)
from the frontiers of the land to rally them around the ark, Israel’s
most sacred relic of the time (13,1-5). This larger group helped him
transfer the ark to Jerusalem (15,3.28) and also participated in an
exuberant celebration at the end (1 Chronicles 16, cf. vv. 3.36b).
Thus, David championed this cause as he effectively brought all Is-
rael together to worship their ancestral God YHWH. Moreover, the
Chronicler also maintains that David preserved this solidarity among
the people until the end of his reign (29,26). This central facet to Is-
rael’s religious atmosphere proves as integral to Solomon’s estab-
lishment of the temple cult as the provision of materials for
construction (cf. 2 Chr 1,2; 7,6.8). Long after the division of the
kingdom, the Chronicler would revisit this theme once again in the
reign of King Hezekiah, who not only reopened the temple but also
sought to regather all Israel for worship there (cf. 2 Chr 30,1-9).
As a second nuance, the Chronicler puts forward the support
of all Israel as a reward to faithful kings 19. Looking again at the
example of David, we see that he garnered the people’s support
on account of his faithfulness to YHWH. At an early point in his
career, his declaration that YHWH would vindicate him if an on-
coming mob betrayed him demonstrates his faith (12,18), while
Amasai’s response reveals that they joined with David “because
your God helps you” (v. 19) 20. In the same vein, his desire to re-
trieve the ark merited even greater support from the people (again,
13,1-5). While David’s sinful command to take a census resulted
in the fragmentation of all Israel (cf. 21,4-6) 21, his renewed focus
on the temple with extensive preparations (1 Chronicles 22–29)
once again unified all Israel just before the transfer of the kingship
19
Divine retribution and blessing have received much attention in Chron-
icles scholarship. Cf. KELLY, Retribution and Eschatology, 29-110. See also
the cautionary notes of E. BEN ZVI, “The Book of Chronicles: Another Look”,
SR 31 (2002) 261-281, here 263-267.
20
For the Chronicler’s distinctive use of the word rz[ (“help”), see H.G.M.
WILLIAMSON, “‘We Are Yours, O David’: The Setting and Purpose of 1
Chronicles 12:1-23”, Studies in Persian Period History and Historiography
(FAT 38; Tübingen 2004) 115-125, here 116-118.
21
Cf. K. RISTAU, “Breaking Down Unity: An Analysis of 1 Chronicles
21:1 – 22:1”, JSOT 30 (2005) 201-221.