Troy D. Cudworth, «The Division of Israel’s Kingdom in Chronicles: A Re-examination of the Usual Suspects.», Vol. 95 (2014) 498-523
The Chronicler constantly adapts the story of Israel’s kingship from the narrative in Samuel-Kings to show his great interest in the temple. With regard to the division of the united kingdom, recent scholarship has correctly shown how he has removed all the blame from Solomon due to his successful construction of the temple, but it has not come to any firm conclusion on whom the Chronicler does find guilty. This article contends that the Chronicler blames Rehoboam for ignoring the plea of «all Israel», an essential facet of the nation’s temple worship.
002_cudworth_co_498_523 13/02/15 11:26 Pagina 502
502 TROY D. CUDWORTH
of a theme he has developed consistently throughout the united
monarchy and even began as early as the genealogies 16. In addition
to the general hyperbolic sense the phrase carries in other parts of
the Hebrew Bible (e.g. Josh 3,7.17; 4,14; etc.), the Chronicler has
attributed to it three particular nuances that impact its meaning in
2 Chr 10,1 – 11,4.
First of all, the Chronicler presents the gathering of all Israel to
the worship of YHWH as the ultimate goal for the nation. In the
opening genealogies the Chronicler shows how Israel’s God elected
them from among all the peoples of the earth (1 Chronicles 1) and
blessed the individual tribes with numerous descendants and a place
in the land (1 Chronicles 2–8). But then, immediately following,
he concludes the genealogies with a section that expresses the hope
that this “all Israel” would once again repopulate the land even after
the exile (1 Chronicles 9, cf. v. 1) 17. After he sets this as the target
for the contemporary community in post-exilic Yehud, he then also
projects it back to Israel’s kings. Accordingly, the Chronicler por-
trays David as the pioneer in this endeavor who held it as his main
objective throughout 1 Chronicles 11–16. The first two of these
chapters offer a flashback to show how he won the support of Is-
raelites from his early days of hiding in the stronghold (cf. 12,17-
19) 18. This group, which eventually grew to become all Israel
(12,38), would then crown him king (11,1-3) and help him conquer
Jerusalem as his new capital (11,4-9).
16
Quite surprisingly, I have found no scholar who has closely investigated
this theme as it pertains to 2 Chr 10,1 – 11,4, and only Japhet has given much
attention to the phrase theologically in the books of Chronicles as a whole;
cf. JAPHET, Ideology, 267-277 (though of course, for the different uses of Is-
rael in Chronicles, see WILLIAMSON, Israel in Chronicles, 87-140).
17
Certainly the clause “So all Israel was recorded in genealogies […]” in
9,1 summarizes and even idealizes all the data before it (1 Chronicles 1–8),
yet it also evokes the sense that this hope, encapsulated by the Chronicler’s
favorite moniker for the united people used for the first time here, will come
to fruition once again.
18
On the use of a flashback here, cf. JAPHET, I & II Chronicles, 233. For
David’s growing support before his reign in 1 Chronicles 11–12, cf. G.N.
KNOPPERS, “Israel’s First King and ‘The Kingdom of YHWH in the Hands of
the Sons of David’: The Place of the Saulide Monarchy in the Chronicler’s
Historiography”, Saul in Story and Tradition (eds. C.S. EHRLICH – M. WHITE)
(FAT 47; Tübingen 2006) 187-213, here 193-200.