Troy D. Cudworth, «The Division of Israel’s Kingdom in Chronicles: A Re-examination of the Usual Suspects.», Vol. 95 (2014) 498-523
The Chronicler constantly adapts the story of Israel’s kingship from the narrative in Samuel-Kings to show his great interest in the temple. With regard to the division of the united kingdom, recent scholarship has correctly shown how he has removed all the blame from Solomon due to his successful construction of the temple, but it has not come to any firm conclusion on whom the Chronicler does find guilty. This article contends that the Chronicler blames Rehoboam for ignoring the plea of «all Israel», an essential facet of the nation’s temple worship.
002_cudworth_co_498_523 13/02/15 11:26 Pagina 511
THE DIVISION OF ISRAEL’S KINGDOM IN CHRONICLES 511
first to last […]”), where he even directs the reader to a record
called “the prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite” (v. 30), presumably
an account that included information on the heavy work that
Solomon imposed on the people (cf. 1 Kgs 11,26-39). For these
reasons, such omissions by the Chronicler (i.e. an argument from
silence) cannot necessarily speak in the way Japhet would like them
to. Any notion of Solomon subjecting Israelites to heavy labor sim-
ply does not support his primary objective (i.e. the temple), and so
he leaves it out.
Along the same lines as Japhet, Klein has put forward a more
robust argument on the basis of 2 Chr 2,16-17 and 8,7-10 as evi-
dence that Solomon never imposed a heavy yoke on his subjects 42.
With the first text, Klein avers that the Chronicler has reversed the
draft of Israelites in 1 Kgs 5,27-28 to include only resident aliens
in 2 Chr 2,16 43. However, it is difficult to see the similarity between
the two since the 1 Kings passage refers to groups of 10,000 men
with a total of 30,000, whereas these numbers do not appear at all
in 2 Chronicles 2. The Chronicler does borrow the material from
the distinct, subsequent list in 1 Kgs 5,29 and applies this to the
resident aliens in 2 Chr 2,16-17, but still, neither these verses nor
any of 2 Chronicles 2 say anything about the people of Israel 44.
Rather than deny that Israelites took part in preparations for
the temple, the Chronicler seems to assume it. In 2,16 he asserts
that Solomon gathered the resident aliens “following the census
David his father had taken […]”. Throughout 1 Chronicles 11–
29, the Chronicler had at many points shown how David tried to
involve as many people as possible in the temple project (see
above). Even after David had gathered all Israel, the Chronicler
illustrated how that support grew still greater with the help of
those who were not part of all Israel, the resident aliens (cf. 1 Chr
22,2). In the same vein, since Solomon had already obtained the
complete backing of all Israel in 2 Chr 1,1-6, the Chronicler
42
KLEIN, 2 Chronicles, 158. Japhet seems to assume this at different points
in her commentary. Cf. JAPHET, I & II Chronicles, 546, 624-625.
43
KLEIN, 2 Chronicles, 158 note 29. Elsewhere in his commentary, Klein
suggests that the Chronicler omitted 1 Kgs 5,27-28 to relieve the contradiction
with 9,20-22 and to salvage Solomon’s reputation (39).
44
Even if the notices in 1 Kgs 5,27-30 all apply to Israel, my main point re-
mains that the Chronicler does not mention Israelites at all in 2 Chronicles 2.