Peter Dubovský, «Why Did the Northern Kingdom Fall According to 2 Kings 15?», Vol. 95 (2014) 321-346
By applying various exegetical methodologies to 2 Kings 15, I have tried to identify the dynamics responsible for the fall of the Northern Kingdom, such as its instability, financial problems, tribal tensions, wrong international policy, etc. By analyzing some Assyrian documents it was shown that these dynamics were often in play during Assyrian invasions.
01_Dubovský_321_346 28/10/14 10:32 Pagina 335
WHY DID THE NORTHERN KINGDOM FALL? 335
V. Menahem’s reign
The following analysis will focus on the structure of chapter 15.
The narrative describes the reign of seven kings ― two Judahite
kings (Azariah and Jotham) and five Israelite kings (Zechariah,
Shallum, Menahem, Pekahiah and Pekah). The reign of these kings
is described in quite a stereotyped manner: the description starts
with an introductory regnal résumé and ends with a concluding reg-
nal résumé. Chapter 15 thus contains seven literary “bricks”, each
separated from the other by regnal résumés. Between the introduc-
tory and concluding regnal résumés events important for the reign
of a given king (see above) are inserted. This literary technique is
not a pattern written in stone, but allows for some variations. Such
variations can be found in the cases of Zechariah, Menahem, and
Pekah. In the case of Zechariah a formula of prophecy-fulfillment
(15,12) is added after the concluding regnal résumé, in the case of
Menahem the introductory résumé is prefixed with an za'–clause (see
below), and in the case of Pekah an outline of international relations
is inserted in the midst of the concluding regnal résumé (15,37).
Taking into consideration not only the stereotyped repetition of
the literary “bricks” as well as the variations from these formulas
we can point out that these literary “bricks” are organized in a con-
centric structure 30.
A Judahite frame: king Azariah (15,1-7)
B Israelite frame: two Israelite kings (Zechariah and Shallum; 15,8-15)
C Center: Menahem’s reign (15,16-22)
B’ Israelite frame: two Israelite kings (Pekahiah and Pekah; 15,23-31)
A’ Judahite frame: king Jotham (15,32-38)
The parallelisms between both sides of the concentric structure
can be identified on the lexical and thematic levels. Parts A and A’
deal with the Judean kings. Similar positive evaluations can also
be found in the evaluation of other kings (1 Kgs 22,43-44; 2 Kgs
12,2-3; 14,3-4; 18,3-4; 22,2), but only in these two cases can we
observe word-for-word repetition. The only different word, besides
30
LONG, 2 Kings, 171.