Peter Dubovský, «Why Did the Northern Kingdom Fall According to 2 Kings 15?», Vol. 95 (2014) 321-346
By applying various exegetical methodologies to 2 Kings 15, I have tried to identify the dynamics responsible for the fall of the Northern Kingdom, such as its instability, financial problems, tribal tensions, wrong international policy, etc. By analyzing some Assyrian documents it was shown that these dynamics were often in play during Assyrian invasions.
01_Dubovský_321_346 28/10/14 10:32 Pagina 325
WHY DID THE NORTHERN KINGDOM FALL? 325
King
Jeroboam
Nadab
Dynasty Baasha Coup d’état
change I. (formula; 1 Kgs 15,27-28)
Elah
Dynasty Zimri Coup d’état
change II. (formula; 1 Kgs 16,9-10)
Dynasty Omri Not a coup d’état
change III. (1 Kgs 16,16-22)
Ahab
Ahaziah
Jehoram
Dynasty Jehu Coup d’état
change IV. (narrative; 2 Kings 9–10)
Jehoahaz
Jehoash
Jeroboam
Zechariah
Dynasty Shallum Coup d’état
change V. (formula; 2 Kgs 15,10)
Dynasty Menahem Coup d’état
change VI. (formula; 2 Kgs 15,14)
Pekahiah
Dynasty Pekah Coup d’état
change VII. (formula; 2 Kgs 15,25)
Dynasty Hoshea Coup d’état
change VIII. (formula; 2 Kgs 15,30)
If we place Menahem’s and Jehu’s coups d’état into the same
group as those defined by a stereotyped formula of conspiracy, then
the conspiracies and revolts in the Northern Kingdom amount to
seven. The number seven indicates totality, completeness, and ful-
fillment 13. It seems that the number seven was employed in order
to convey the idea of completeness, i.e., the totality of the coups
13
Cf. for example Gen 2,2; 4,24; 7,4; 41,2-54; Exod 7,25; 16,26-27; etc.