Peter Dubovský, «Why Did the Northern Kingdom Fall According to 2 Kings 15?», Vol. 95 (2014) 321-346
By applying various exegetical methodologies to 2 Kings 15, I have tried to identify the dynamics responsible for the fall of the Northern Kingdom, such as its instability, financial problems, tribal tensions, wrong international policy, etc. By analyzing some Assyrian documents it was shown that these dynamics were often in play during Assyrian invasions.
01_Dubovský_321_346 28/10/14 10:32 Pagina 324
324 PETER DUBOVSKÝ
dynasty 9. Finally, it was not Omri but the people of Israel who
eliminated Tibni’s followers. These reasons suggest that Omri’s as-
cension to the throne should not be understood as a coup d’état.
For this reason, Tibni is also not listed in the following table, and
his removal from the throne is not considered a dynastic change.
The last dynastic change to be evaluated is Jehu’s revolt and his
extermination of Ahab’s dynasty (2 Kings 9–10) 10. Neither in this
case can we speak about the stereotyped formula of a coup d’état.
The narrative starts with the anointing of Jehu, and therefore the
extermination of Ahab’s dynasty can be considered one of the
“heroic deeds” of a new king as in the case of Omri. However, the
narrative contains several elements that prompt an attentive reader
to notice the literary motif of coup d’état. After an introduction de-
scribing how the officers proclaimed Jehu king, the narrator char-
acterizes Jehu’s ascension to the throne as a conspiracy (2 Kgs
9,14). After this narrative comment, the narration continues with a
lengthy description of bloodshed. In 2 Kgs 10,9 Jehu himself de-
fines his coup d’état as a conspiracy and assumes the responsibility
for the death of the king Jehoram, using the verb hkn. Finally in 2
Kgs 10,36 the narrator informs us that Jehu ruled over Israel for 28
years ($lm), considering him a true king. In sum, 2 Kings 9–10 con-
tain the basic elements of a coup d’état: Jehu conspired against the
king (verb rvq: 2 Kgs 9,14; 10,9), he struck down the kings of Is-
rael and Judah and other members of the royal family (verb hkn: 2
Kgs 9,24.27; 10,9.11.17.25), he killed them (instead of the verb twm
the verb grh 11 is used: 2 Kgs 10,9), and finally Jehu became the king
in Samaria (the verb $lm: 2 Kgs 9,1-13; 10,36). These elements in-
dicate that, even though we cannot speak about the formula of coup
d’état being used by them, the final redactors classified the story
as a conspiracy narrated in the style of a story (Erzählung) 12.
The following table relates the series of coups d’état to the dy-
nasty changes:
9
In the case of Shallum, despite the fact that he reigned only for one
month the résumés are still given (2 Kgs 15,13.15).
10
S. HASEGAWA, Aram and Israel during the Jehuite Dynasty (BZAW 434;
Berlin – Boston, MA 2012) 12-35.
11
This variant is used in 2 Chr 24,25.
12
LONG, I Kings, 261.