Peter Dubovský, «Why Did the Northern Kingdom Fall According to 2 Kings 15?», Vol. 95 (2014) 321-346
By applying various exegetical methodologies to 2 Kings 15, I have tried to identify the dynamics responsible for the fall of the Northern Kingdom, such as its instability, financial problems, tribal tensions, wrong international policy, etc. By analyzing some Assyrian documents it was shown that these dynamics were often in play during Assyrian invasions.
01_Dubovský_321_346 28/10/14 10:32 Pagina 342
342 PETER DUBOVSKÝ
that there was no one primary reason why the Northern Kingdom
fell but rather a series of elements whose combination ultimately
led to the downfall of Israel. I will divide the reasons for the fall of
the Northern Kingdom into seven categories 46:
(1) The analysis of the fixed formula coup d’état, indicated that the
Northern Kingdom during its last years reached the peak of its political
instability and that a kingdom torn by seven (the full number of coups
d’état) could not last too long.
(2) The analysis of additions to the fixed formula brought similar re-
sults: the unstable kingdom became unsafe. The conspiracies penetrated
the whole kingdom and reached even the supposedly safest place in the
kingdom – the royal keep. The rebels and conspirers penetrated all social
strata: they were among commoners, among local aristocracy as well as
among the king’s most trusted men. The conspiracies were not just a se-
ries of mishaps but the social structure and the entire land became in-
fected 47. Finally, the analysis of narration time and the combination of
events attributed to four northern kings showed that instability had a ten-
dency to increase.
(3) The analysis of seemingly redundant details pointed to the tensions
underlying the conspiracies and revolts. The kingdom was torn into
pieces by tensions between the tribes settled on both sides of Jordan as
well as by tensions between Samaria and Tirzah, the new and old capitals
of Israel.
(4) The analysis of heroes in the description of Assyrian invasions
brought up another dynamic that led to the fall of the Northern Kingdom:
gradual loss of executive power. Whereas Menahem was still able to ne-
gotiate with Assyria, Pekah became a passive witness of Assyrian looting.
While identifying the narrative center of the passage I proposed two
other causes of the collapse of the Northern Kingdom: Menahem’s bru-
tality and the drain on finances.
46
The number seven is evidently an approximate number and one could
add other causes not mentioned in this analysis or form different groups of
causes. The choice of “seven” hints at the symbolic value of this number –
the completeness of causes.
47
According to Num 35,33-34, violent bloodshed, often connected with
coups d’état, pollutes the land in such a way that no expiation can be made
for it. When this infection of the land ‘reaches the level that God’s holiness
can no longer tolerate, God forsakes his people and his land, withdrawing his
protection and care’, see B. HROBOŇ, Ethical Dimension of Cult in the Book
of Isaiah (BZAW 418; Berlin – New York 2010) 54.