Peter Dubovský, «Why Did the Northern Kingdom Fall According to 2 Kings 15?», Vol. 95 (2014) 321-346
By applying various exegetical methodologies to 2 Kings 15, I have tried to identify the dynamics responsible for the fall of the Northern Kingdom, such as its instability, financial problems, tribal tensions, wrong international policy, etc. By analyzing some Assyrian documents it was shown that these dynamics were often in play during Assyrian invasions.
		01_Dubovský_321_346 28/10/14 10:32 Pagina 345
                                WHY DID THE NORTHERN KINGDOM FALL?                     345
               Kingdom as well. In particular he listed the struggle over sover-
               eignty that caused some noble families to take sides with one faction
               or another, the elimination of opponents, a request for total loyalty
               and death threats in the case of defection or betrayal, concession of
               privileges, and finally famines and demographic crises 53.
                   Another reason for instability of a given region was heavy tax-
               ation. K. Radner has listed various types of taxes and tributes the
               Assyrians imposed upon their subordinates or partners 54. Heavy
               tributes, on the one hand, brought in capital to Assyria, and, on the
               other hand, they drained a given region and usually triggered re-
               bellions and coups d’état. An illustrative example is the rebellion
               of the Arabs. The continuous increase in taxes brought the Arabs
               to desperation and then to rebellion against Assyria. The rebellion
               was considered a transgression (sin) and was violently suppressed
               by Esarhaddon (RINAP 4 1 iv 1-31).
                   These examples illustrate that some dynamics decoded in the
               rhetoric of 2 Kings 15 were tools that the Assyrians often employed
               to buttress their military campaigns. In particular, the Assyrians
               willingly supported political factions and fomented the instability
               of a given region. Naturally, similar dynamics were not invented
               by the Assyrians, but also occurred in other periods and regions.
                                                 *       *
                                                     *
                  The annalistic passages of the Bible, such as 2 Kings 15, have
               been studied mainly for the purpose of the reconstruction of political
               history of a given period. In this paper I have tried to demonstrate
               that such kind of passages convey not only a description of the
               events that can be more or less reliable, but also an interpretation of
                  53
                      M. GIORGIERI, “Kingship in Ḫatti during the 13th Century: Forms of
               Rule and Struggles for Power before the Fall of the Empire”, Pax Hethitica.
               Studies on the Hittites and Their Neighbours in Honour of Itamar Singer (eds.
               Y. COHEN – A. GILAN) (Wiesbaden 2010) 136-157.
                   54
                      K. RADNER, “Abgaben an den König von Assyrien aus dem In- und
               Ausland”, Geschenke und Steuern, Zölle und Tribute. Antike Abgabenformen
               in Anspruch und Wirklichkeit (eds. H. KLINKOTT – S. KUBISCH) (Culture and
               History of the Ancient Near East 29; Leiden – Boston, MA 2007) 213-230.