Jonathan H. Walton, «A King Like The Nations: 1 Samuel 8 in Its Cultural Context.», Vol. 96 (2015) 179-200
Commentators on 1 Samuel 8 offer a variety of interpretations about what the requested king is expected to replace: judgeship, YHWH himself, or Israel's covenant identity. This article demonstrates that none of these proposals account for the Biblical text adequately. It is proposed instead that the king is intended to replace the Ark of the Covenant. The king will then manipulate YHWH into leading in battle. This is what ancient Near Eastern kings were able to do with their gods, and what the ark failed to do in 1 Samuel 4.
02_Walton_179_200_179_200 10/07/15 11:58 Pagina 191
191 A KING LIKE THE NATIONS: 1 SAMUEL 8 IN ITS CULTURAL CONTEXT 191
they do with Abimelek (Judg 9,1-6) or Absalom (2 Sam 15,10-12),
with no official sanction required. If a new God is what they want,
they can simply start worshipping one, which they spend most of their
history doing anyway. Further, when it is clear that what they want is
to opt out of the Covenant, as in Numbers 14, they do not ask Moses
to appoint for them a new leader; instead they decide to kill Moses
and Aaron (v. 10) and choose a leader themselves (v. 4). Despite Es-
linger’s theory to the contrary 58, the respect the elders demonstrate
toward the system is a clear indicator that they wish for the system,
along with their covenant identity, to remain more or less intact.
V. Conclusions from Review of the Literature
None of these proposed interpretations is sufficient to explain
what exactly is wrong with the elders’ request. The monarchy as
an institution is too well regarded elsewhere in the Deuteronomistic
History, including the books of Samuel, to allow the reader of the
final redacted form to see it as inherently evil, either sociopolitically
or theologically. The desire to imitate the nations cannot indicate a
break from theocracy since the nations are also theocratic, and it
cannot indicate a desire to break from the covenant and its institu-
tions since they seek legitimacy in accordance with those institu-
tions, i.e. they ask Samuel. We must therefore examine other factors
to determine the manner in which a request for a monarch consti-
tutes rejection of YHWH.
VI. To Fight Our Battles
We will begin our investigation by examining what the elders
want the king to do. Most commentators focus on vv. 5 and 20
(“judge us”) or v. 9 (“rule over them”) 59, and from this they conclude
that the king is supposed to replace the judge or the deity (who cur-
rently rules) or both; as we have seen, these arguments are not ten-
able. Samuel’s emphasis on “judge us” in v. 6 sheds no light on the
issue either, as commentators are divided as to whether the narrator
58
ESLINGER, Kingship, 255.
59
See TSUMURA, Samuel, 249.