A.L.H.M. van Wieringen, «The "I"-Figure's Relations in the Poem in Isa 38,10-20», Vol. 96 (2015) 481-497
This article offers a close reading of the Writing of Hezekiah (Isa 38,10-20) and describes the development of both the relation between the "I"-figure and the Lord and that between the "I"-figure and the community. An "ellipsis" between vv. 14 and 15 plays a prominent role. Furthermore, the article demonstrates that the developments in the "I"-figure's relations in the poem fit well within the poem's context (chapters 36–39). The ellipsis in the poem is connected to the open ending of chapter 38, to the happy conclusion of chapters 36–37, and to the open ending of chapter 39.
01_van Wieringen_481-497_481-497 10/12/15 10:10 Pagina 490
490 ARCHIBALD VAN WIERINGEN 490
name hwhy is used in v. 20. In this instance, however, it is used not
as a vocative, but as a third person.
Both the “I”-figure’s speaking in the poem of Isaiah 38 and
Hezekiah’s praying in the narrative of Isaiah 38 evoke a response.
Following Hezekiah’s prayer to the Lord in v. 3, the Lord’s answer
is mediated to Hezekiah by the prophet Isaiah. Consequently,
Hezekiah’s direct speech addressed to the Lord does not result in
the Lord speaking directly to Hezekiah. Instead, the Lord’s answer
to Hezekiah is indicated in the poem itself, through the use of el-
lipsis between vv. 14 and 15.
The repetitions of words found in Hezekiah’s prayer and the poem
are minimal. Only two literal repetitions of words occur, and they sup-
port the difference between the prayer and the poem regarding the re-
lation between the speaking character (Hezekiah / the “I”-figure) and
the Lord. The first repetition is the word ~yny[. In his prayer, Hezekiah
asks whether the eyes of the Lord have really seen his good deeds (v.
3). In the poem, in v. 14, it is the other way round: the “I”-figure ex-
presses that his eyes are not able to look in the direction of the Lord.
The second repetition is the verb hf[. In his prayer to the Lord,
Hezekiah refers to what he himself has done (hf[, v. 3). In the end,
it is the Lord who appears to be the acting person. Emphasizing that
it is the Lord who really does (hf[, v. 7) what he says, Isaiah adds
to God’s answer a further sign from God. In the poem, the “I”-fig-
ure expresses the connection between speaking and doing: in v. 15
he is silent about his own deeds, but he acknowledges that the Lord
has indeed done (hf[) what he said he would do.
This contrast seems to be continued after the poem. The text
does not explicitly mention to whom Hezekiah poses his question
about the sign, but in view of the fact that hwhy is present as a third
person in v. 22 and that Isaiah is speaking in v. 21, it is more likely
that he directs the question not to the Lord but rather to Isaiah. This
means that Hezekiah’s direct speech to the Lord at the end of the
poem becomes an indirect speech after the conclusion of this poem.
The repetitions of words found in the poem and in vv. 21-22 are
also minimal. The nominal expression hwhy tyb is used both in v,
20, at the end of the poem, and in v. 22, in the direct speech of
Hezekiah. In both cases, the house of the Lord is discussed from
the perspective of those who are in the process of ascending. In v.
20, this is expressed by using the preposition l[, and in v. 22 by
the verb hl[.